Member Analysis with GM Jesse Kraai

Sort:
SimonMTL

null

POST YOUR GAME BELOW to have it analyzed by GM JESSE KRAAI on 
Tuesday December 17th on www.twitch.tv/jessekraai

At 12:30 pm Pacific time! 

PLEASE NOTE THE CHANGED TIME AND DATE!

3 HOURS LONG! 

The goal of the show is to help you analyze your games - the true path to improve your chess. So write out as much of your thinking as you can in your annotations. Tell us where the game was played and the time control too. If you look up past threads you will find many fine examples of amateur players writing about their games.

Not sure how to post your game? Chess.com has you covered! Just check out the video below to learn how! 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nI7lGCZP6TA

Don't miss my brand new club either! 

Homsar
Hello! Last time I sent this game in a bit late, hopefully this time since I'm one of the first to send a game you'll get a chance to look at it. 
 
My big question is what do you think of the piece for pawns imbalance? I know it worked for me in the game, but I'm curious about the "correctness" of it. I know that you and your infinite GM wisdom could give me some greater clarity. Thank you.

 

Beastmeesh

 

Fast_OODA_Loop

Good afternoon! This is a 15|10 Rapid game here in Chess.com. It is my first victory against a 1400+ Rapid-rated opponent. I started off well, then gave my opponent the chance to strike back, managing to regain the initiative and finally I succeeded in forcing my opponent to make a crucial mistake and proceed to win the game.

 

PS: forgot to mention, my rating after the game was 1427, my opponent's rating 1459.

 
 

 

Travkusken

 

CornerPawn

Hello Jessi,
I admire your chess work. Keep driving those pieces hard!
I was very lucky to draw this game. It was a Club tournament, Daily Chess 3 days/move here at Chess.com. I played the Black side of a 2...Nf6 Scandinavian Defence. 
I failed to follow a good book line even though the theoretical move suggested came with an exclamation point! This is absolutely careless.
The inferior move that I played gave White a powerful center which I was fortunate enough to warp a bit with a tactical blow.
There was a point in the middle game when I could have forsaken material for piece activity. I failed to do that and fell deeper into trouble. The alternatives that I missed appear to be instructive but I'm not at that level of chess -- yet.
Late in the middle game, faced with several losing variations, I went into a King and Pawn ending that loses easily. I didn't know how bad it was for me at the time. It looked as good as what I could see as alternatives. My opponent let me off the hook a second time finding the only move that allowed me to draw the ending. The ending seems instructive.
Overall, I played hazzardous chess.
https://share.chessbase.com/SharedGames/share/?p=B6x9ij4Mg4yQWWO4YcafpFJjRwVb2Wumx/lR70JYrWRkT95hZSqyoPkLYsDWXDsq

 

Ricker

 

Ricker

I have gone up 50 points in my rating since studying my games as Jesse recommends. And, I am playing beyond that, but still blundering which is keeping me humble. I expect to get past most of that with more patience during the games, studying what the opponent has in mind more thoroughly. Ricker

Ricker

The game above he resigned but I looked at the continuation a la Stockfish.

Saint-Nick

 

Paul1e4
I've heard that when there is opposite side castling, the side that attacks first has the advantage. I've also heard that attacking is easier than defending. Neither statement is true when I am the one who is attacking. I don't know if my "attack" was premature, incompetently executed, or (most likely) both. It shows that I shouldn't sacrifice material unless I see a clear path to victory, and also shows why I shouldn't try to make plans. This was a Daily Chess game (3 days to make a move) played earlier this month. I have not done the computer analysis.

 

CamLeslie
Hi everyone. I've watched a bunch of these and find them super insightful so I thought I would share a game I played. This was in a Team League 45+45 and I'm on the first board. I'm rated a little over 2000 in real life and I am trying to make a run on the master title. But first I've got to start playing long slow games again. So I joined this league and this was one of my first forays. Thanks!

 

Paul1e4
robbievinchenko wrote:

What if I don't write annotations?

If you don't write annotations, GM Kraai won't know what you were thinking or why you made certain moves. I know from what he has said in these webcasts that he wants you to learn to analyze your games.

CrowdedHelium

 

Travkusken
This game and NOT THE GAME IN POST #6 is the game i'm submitting for the show because i think this was a strategically intresting game and a fun game to play

 

Mindworm64

As always, thanks tons for doing this show, Jesse!

 

liszt85
 
 
A game I spent close to 12 hrs total (over a few weeks) analyzing. I still ended up missing somee key lines. 90/40 SD30 +30"

 

Dclawyerantitrust

Can some one show me how to post games like this?