If the games are classical high quality games, yes you can do it, but I wouldn't bother with modern games.
@bb_gum : the trick is that you usually need to understand what's going on to memorize the game (at least that was my experience).
If the games are classical high quality games, yes you can do it, but I wouldn't bother with modern games.
@bb_gum : the trick is that you usually need to understand what's going on to memorize the game (at least that was my experience).
I just recently watched part of a video on YouTube by IM Pruess about it. He has 3 in the series I think.
He suggested shorter games to begin with, which makes sense, and to get them from well annotated collections, which will help with the understanding. His first example is pretty trivial, a 7 or 8 mover from the Alekhine where black resigned after losing a knight.
Not sure how well it helps though. Can't really hurt to memorize some games.
I have memorized the Morphy Opera game. It is rather short, almost all of the moves are forcing, and demonstrates important opening principles. I also play the scotch so this was an easy choice!
Memorizing games to understand positional ideas makes sense, and there are some model games that demonstrate key strategic themes. I can see, for example, memorizing the Fischer-Gadia game as a good demonstration of how to play against the beliaslavky hole.
I would pick pawn structures from the openings you play, and then select model games that highlight the important strategic themes. As a beginner that might take some real research and hard work, but it couldn't hurt.
I am a beginner player wondering if memorizing GM Games would help me to understand positional play better.