Minimum rating to be taken seriously?

Sort:
french

What do you all think is the minimum rating you need to be taken seriously by masters? 

french

I think its like 2000?

marqumax
2200
Veydant110

2100

Ilampozhil25
frog wrote:

2300

bruh 2200 is master

cm

so youre saying masters dont take themselves seriously

id say like 2000 or 2100

maphellox
1200
french
frog wrote:
Ilampozhil25 wrote:
frog wrote:

2300

bruh 2200 is master

cm

so youre saying masters dont take themselves seriously

id say like 2000 or 2100

2200 online isnt master

im not a master and I do not take 2200s seriously

what do you take seriously?

DoYouLikeCurry

depends which masters, i guess. I imagine CMs and FMs take 2000s seriously, but GMs are unlikely to, and definitely the top players won't take anything less than GM seriously - I mean Magnus has been doing ridiculous openings in blitz against other GMs cos he's the goat.

NotAUniqueUserName

1000 = amateur student. 1500 = amateur player. 2000 = professional student. 2500 = professional player.

1e4c6_O-1
NotAUniqueUserName wrote:

1000 = amateur student. 1500 = amateur player. 2000 = professional student. 2500 = professional player.

how can you be a professional student? get paid to learn?

Deadmanparty

By who? Pretty much everyone on earth? A rating here of about 700 should do it.

By serious chess players who devoted hours of their life for years to study the game? Much higher.

Sea_TurtIe

id say people above 1850 are taken seriously, many people below that play as if they are rétárdéd (on chess.com, nobody plays like a rétárd OTB) but otb if you are above 1600 you are taken fr

paper_llama

Competitively, around 200 points below someone's rating can still be taken a bit seriously. Below that and it's hard. I know 300-400 points is still close enough to win sometimes... but when it's that far apart it's hard to care much about your opponent heh.

But taking seriously in other ways... even if you're a GM you can respect that it took someone a year to get a 1200 rating (or whatever). People who are obsessed with chess tend to like others who have some of the same obsession... but obviously a GM wont take a 1200 seriously as an opponent.

CoreyDevinPerich
2300
paper_llama
frog wrote:
1e4_0-1 wrote:
frog wrote:
Ilampozhil25 wrote:
frog wrote:

2300

bruh 2200 is master

cm

so youre saying masters dont take themselves seriously

id say like 2000 or 2100

2200 online isnt master

im not a master and I do not take 2200s seriously

what do you take seriously?

if we are talking blitz 2300

maybe rapid 2200

The tricky thing with rapid is if it's too low OR high you can't take it seriously wink.png

idilis
1e4_0-1 wrote:

What do you all think is the minimum rating you need to be taken seriously by masters?

Which master? Kasparov famously labeled most GMs chess tourists

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-players/the-chess-tourist-pioneers

Ilampozhil25

no one told me that this was online

anyway

otb, 2200 is the definition of master

Ilampozhil25

and i assume everyone takes themselves seriously, so 2200s are taken seriously by masters (2200s)

french
Ilampozhil25 wrote:

and i assume everyone takes themselves seriously, so 2200s are taken seriously by masters (2200s)

I usually take 2200s seriously, but when they have been floored at 2200 for years and years I don't.

newbie4711

It depends on your own Rating. If you are 1500 a 1700 can be taken seriously. If you are a 1700 a 1900 ist a serious opponent.

In general I would say a 1800 is a strong Club player.

(OTB rating, not chess.com puzzle rating)