Morphy was an overrated CAVEMAN PATZER

@urk.

How does not Morphy not suck at endgames?

LOL

I just saw all I had to see, Steinitz would DESTROY Morphy so hard it would be PAINFUL to see their games.

"The Genius of Paul Morphy" - title of a book by GM Chris Ward

Yet he lost that endgame?

"... [Morphy] had good endgame technique for his time ..." - GM Valeri Beim

Again, talking about relativity, and attackimg my thread with 5 comments.

He was a patzer when it came to endgames, and almost every other master that came after him wouldnt have lost that endgame.

Were mistakes made from time to time by "almost every other master that came after him"?

We are not discussing that, and you are reaching high stupidity levels, in fact, Im starting to suffer brain damage, thanks for the conversation tho.

Congrats to the coder of kindaspongey, those new tweaks make him look more like a human and less like a script.

wow youre right lol

Is this an admission that those who came before him were not any better? A player is usually compared with players of previous generations, and not with future generations where theory and research will obviously lead to advantage. This entire thread is a joke. One day you compare Morphy with others, the next day you say it is foolish to compare players - https://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/you-are-all-fools-stop-comparing-players

Do you suffer from some sort of split personality disorder?

 Or as per the other thread, this is an indirect admission that you are a fool?

Are you jealous of my success in the chess world?

This is just to prove Morphy wasnt some sort of demigod.

Also, I find it funny than you call me stupid when you are the guy falling for basic, cheap and uncreative trolling. I really do not care if urk or anyone else wrongly sees Morphy as a god, I just wanted to see how far I could go in one day.

Thats right honey, Im always right.