You're welcome! I'm glad that you think so highly of my correction!
If you're interested in improving yourself futher through more meaningful cooperation, I would highly recommend joining the ETS!
Most annoying chess player ever!
Sort:
Jul 2, 2014
0
#23
macer75 wrote:
You're welcome! I'm glad that you think so highly of my correction!
If you're interested in improving yourself futher through more meaningful cooperation, I would highly recommend joining the ETS!
what is futher
Jul 2, 2014
0
#25
kinghunter75 wrote:
isn't "brah" a piece of clothing? ohhhhhhhhh, wait a minute...that's "bra," silly me, "brah" is what a sheep or goat says.
+1, brah
thenoor wrote:
can anyone explain how can someone play 800+ games at same time?????
is it he doesnt have any life besides chess????
Well, look at his rating. That's how.
brettw777 wrote:
This may not be the place to whine and complain about an opponent but this just beats all. I thought I would share with you just how low and annoying some members of the human race can possibly be...even when it comes to a game.
the user name of this guy. Here is what he does: In every game he plays in, he absolutely refuses to resign a lost game and I don't care if you have 5 queens on the board, he will not resign. This is not that unusual here on this site because I have found other players like this. However, here is the kicker and what takes him to an all new level of buttwipeness: If it is a 10 day move game, he waits until the last day to make his move in these lost games. I have been in a game with this guy for months and realized what he was doing and checked his other games. He does it that way against everybody in the lost games. I have already told him how I feel about it and him personally and he has disabled all chats. All I can is "how much of a jerk can one person be?"
Really? Another one of these threads? Does he refuse to resign when it's absolutely hopeless or does he actually make you earn your win? Study technique (Lasker said the hardest game to win is a won game).
I tend to focus on skills that are most often neglected (technique and defense in particular) and play the Berlin Wall (other than that I don't like queenless middlegames usually to be fair) and 2.Nf3 against 1...Nf6 (no Grunfeld or Budapest for you!) so I thought this was going to be about me 
I take long on a move sometimes, but correspondance is high risk because if you make a mistake the opponent has a lot of time to find and punish it. Heck, I'm careful and still make mistakes.
He's up a rook and bishop and a passed pawn which can't be stopped from promoting.
Hardly necessary to study technique.
Update. Well, lo and behold, miracles happen. The guy just resigned one of our two games but still not the one where it is much more obvious that he has lost. In fact, he has resigned in his last 3 losses so maybe he is catching hell from his other opponents or he is seeing the light. I had not even noticed that he had over 800 games going. That is truly nuts.
You two are not well matched for playing chess together.
I have no desire to ever play him again. I wonder if there is a way to block him out of my chess life....
lol, actually the "immensely injuriously" was a more salient syntax gaffe in my opinion.
I believe that should be "syntactic gaffe." Then again, I could be wrong. After all, I didn't know that "persnicketiness" was a word until you pointed it out for me.
ah, yes thank you for the correction. I should have said a more salient syntactical gaffe. Thank you. The brain needs to be challenged (that is why I type quickly as to simulate a real conversation or an extemporaneous event, since the spontaneity maximizes my brain's ability to not only to write well( yes, I write actually well once I proofread); but present and debate well which is my strength. Cooperation is the panacea for all life's problems. For penicillin would not have been invented if Sir Winston Churchill was not saved by Alexander Fleming (read the story), yes that minutiae or infinitesimal event reverberated to have illimitable social, economical, and psychological reprecussions even to this day and will continue to the end of existence. Cooperation is why humans are inherently social creatures, for socialization allows us to communicate and articulate our beliefs and ideas formulating into an additive, incessant process of growth and amelioration. Even the brain itself is adaptive by nature its growth is corollary to how we use it. Thus, your correction is not stultifying to me, but rather encouraging for it conveys a need for me to improve.