i take back about what i said about stalemate, if anything the guy you stalemate should win
MOST STUPID RULE : STALEMATE

to whoever thinks the enpassant rule is good, it legit makes no sence, you move 2 spaces with your pawn and your enemy pawn that your now next to, eats you, BRUH
Kid...you have just started to play the game. So you aren't qualified enough to pass a comment on a rule that has been in existence for 100s of years.

i take back about what i said about stalemate, if anything the guy you stalemate should win
Could you give us any logic to support your statement ?
It's a stupid rule. I don't mind that you can wind up in a draw in a clearly won position. You just need to be careful, but conceptually it makes no sense, and it creates more situations where a forced win is impossible even though you are up material.

It's a stupid rule. I don't mind that you can wind up in a draw in a clearly won position. You just need to be careful, but conceptually it makes no sense, and it creates more situations where a forced win is impossible even though you are up material.
Mate..just admit that you are incompetent enough to comprehend the logic behind it. No need to call it stupid. There are grandmasters and intellectuals playing the game with a considerable amount of iq higher than yours. They aren't stupid to not raise an objection to any weird rule if needed. If at all the rule didn't make any sense there would have been objections raised. But they weren't . Why ? Because there is reason behind it.....which you will take time to understand.

That's why you need to be careful not to make careless plays at the end of a game. If your opponent isn't in check you don't win even if they can't move.
to whoever thinks the enpassant rule is good, it legit makes no sence, you move 2 spaces with your pawn and your enemy pawn that your now next to, eats you, BRUH