MS Jean is gone

Sort:
HessianWarrior

Personally I think Kevin screwed up.

dannyhume
ilikeflags wrote:
dannyhume wrote:
HessianWarrior wrote:

Another paradox of going back in time that is not mentioned; is if say a person goes back in time, finds Ben Franklin as a young man and hands young Ben a copy of all his futrure witty sayings such as "A penny saved is a penny earned". Who is the author of those sayings? Not Ben and not the traveler.


Wait a minute, what if there is a "time" outside of time?  Like you give Ben his own sayings, but you could not have gotten them without him having uttered them first, yet you go back in "time" to give them to him, but that is different from the foundational cosmological time-cloud in which Ben in fact was first regardless of time travel?   Hash brownies are good.


ben frankilin invented dinosaurs.


Look sinner, you need to read Genesis 1 or 2 in the King James Bible in the language from the land you wish you were and take your pick which version is correct.  Then you'll know who really invented dinosaurs and when (the order of creation is not important).

corrijean

No religious discussion in the forums.

ilikeflags

haha  me too.  it's amazing the influence MsJean has had on this site.  this dude (whom i have mutal friends with) is so enamoured with this "chick" he's interacted with in the internet, that he's willing to say the types of things he's said to me--behind closed doors.  in person?  there's no way this tubby middle aged dude opens his mouth to me.  nor, does he even have cause to. the interweb does strange things to people.

checkmateibeatu
checkmateibeatu wrote: You love the kind of things he was saying? How is that possible?!
ilikeflags
dannyhume wrote:
ilikeflags wrote:
dannyhume wrote:
HessianWarrior wrote:

Another paradox of going back in time that is not mentioned; is if say a person goes back in time, finds Ben Franklin as a young man and hands young Ben a copy of all his futrure witty sayings such as "A penny saved is a penny earned". Who is the author of those sayings? Not Ben and not the traveler.


Wait a minute, what if there is a "time" outside of time?  Like you give Ben his own sayings, but you could not have gotten them without him having uttered them first, yet you go back in "time" to give them to him, but that is different from the foundational cosmological time-cloud in which Ben in fact was first regardless of time travel?   Hash brownies are good.


ben frankilin invented dinosaurs.


Look sinner, you need to read Genesis 1 or 2 in the King James Bible in the language from the land you wish you were and take your pick which version is correct.  Then you'll know who really invented dinosaurs and when (the order of creation is not important).


get ready son.  here comes satan! 

King James I has got to be one of my favorite movers and shakers in the british literary world.  he wrote one hell of a book--well, his team did.  i love to teach me some bible myths in my brit lit class.

ilikeflags
checkmateibeatu wrote:
checkmateibeatu wrote: You love the kind of things he was saying? How is that possible?!

flags then wrote:

dannyhume
corrijean wrote:

No religious discussion in the forums.


It's your soul but fine, "safe" topics it is...How 'bout those U.S. Republicans?  Palin as late entry for president?  She would never take these so called "scientists'" at their word or "data" regarding particles, light, and time travel. 

HessianWarrior
dannyhume wrote:
HessianWarrior wrote:

Another paradox of going back in time that is not mentioned; is if say a person goes back in time, finds Ben Franklin as a young man and hands young Ben a copy of all his futrure witty sayings such as "A penny saved is a penny earned". Who is the author of those sayings? Not Ben and not the traveler.


Wait a minute, what if there is a "time" outside of time?  Like you give Ben his own sayings, but you could not have gotten them without him having uttered them first, yet you go back in "time" to give them to him, but that is different from the foundational cosmological time-cloud in which Ben in fact was first regardless of time travel?   Hash brownies are good.


 Ben was not on Hash Brownies when I gave him the sayings, and his brain had no concept of what he would write in the future without looking at what I brought him from the future.

ilikeflags
dannyhume wrote:
corrijean wrote:

No religious discussion in the forums.


It's your soul but fine, "safe" topics it is...How 'bout those U.S. Republicans?  Palin as late entry for president?  She would never take these so called "scientists'" at their word or "data" regarding particles, light, and time travel. 


i kinda love this too.  instead of using science to decipher science, let's use feelings and myth.  hell, let's use feelings and myth for everything.

dannyhume
HessianWarrior wrote:
dannyhume wrote:
HessianWarrior wrote:

Another paradox of going back in time that is not mentioned; is if say a person goes back in time, finds Ben Franklin as a young man and hands young Ben a copy of all his futrure witty sayings such as "A penny saved is a penny earned". Who is the author of those sayings? Not Ben and not the traveler.


Wait a minute, what if there is a "time" outside of time?  Like you give Ben his own sayings, but you could not have gotten them without him having uttered them first, yet you go back in "time" to give them to him, but that is different from the foundational cosmological time-cloud in which Ben in fact was first regardless of time travel?   Hash brownies are good.


 Ben was not on Hash Brownies when I gave him the sayings, and his brain had no concept of what he would write in the future without looking at what I brought him from the future.


But dudemar, what if a 3rd party went back in time before you did and told Ben to feign ignorance when you arrived regarding the concept of time travel, his own future witticism collection book from you, and hash brownies in order that you think you caused his sayings and proclaim such so that I argue about this and in light of this argument, the seeds of John Connor's strategy to fight the terminators begin with this epistemological discussion?  It's for the world, man!  

corrijean
dannyhume wrote:
corrijean wrote:

No religious discussion in the forums.


It's your soul but fine, "safe" topics it is...How 'bout those U.S. Republicans?  Palin as late entry for president?  She would never take these so called "scientists'" at their word or "data" regarding particles, light, and time travel. 


If you want to talk about religion or politics, there are plenty of groups to do it in.

Open Discussion Group

Christian Chess World

Atheists and Theists

to name a few.

ilikeflags
corrijean wrote:
dannyhume wrote:
corrijean wrote:

No religious discussion in the forums.


It's your soul but fine, "safe" topics it is...How 'bout those U.S. Republicans?  Palin as late entry for president?  She would never take these so called "scientists'" at their word or "data" regarding particles, light, and time travel. 


If you want to talk about religion or politics, there are plenty of groups to do it in.

Open Discussion Group

Christian Chess World

Atheists and Theists

to name a few.


that's too easy Cj.  doesn't give your saved friend the satisfaction of damning the "sinners" in public.  genesis told me to type that.  but not necessarily in that order.

dannyhume
ilikeflags wrote:
dannyhume wrote:
corrijean wrote:

No religious discussion in the forums.


It's your soul but fine, "safe" topics it is...How 'bout those U.S. Republicans?  Palin as late entry for president?  She would never take these so called "scientists'" at their word or "data" regarding particles, light, and time travel. 


i kinda love this too.  instead of using science to decipher science, let's use feelings and myth.  hell, let's use feelings and myth for everything.


Well, your so-called "science" is just one side of the story and they all need to presented to the public.  Did you know that there is a virtual monopoly in the scientific community regarding the necessity of "data" and "experimentation" to prove things?  But guess what?  The earth wasn't created in a controlled setting...or was it?  BAM!  Checkmate.  

corrijean
ilikeflags wrote:
corrijean wrote:
dannyhume wrote:
corrijean wrote:

No religious discussion in the forums.


It's your soul but fine, "safe" topics it is...How 'bout those U.S. Republicans?  Palin as late entry for president?  She would never take these so called "scientists'" at their word or "data" regarding particles, light, and time travel. 


If you want to talk about religion or politics, there are plenty of groups to do it in.

Open Discussion Group

Christian Chess World

Atheists and Theists

to name a few.


that's too easy Cj.  doesn't give your saved friend the satisfaction of damning the "sinners" in public.  genesis told me to type that.  but not necessarily in that order.


 Very true.

corrijean
dannyhume wrote:
ilikeflags wrote:
dannyhume wrote:
corrijean wrote:

No religious discussion in the forums.


It's your soul but fine, "safe" topics it is...How 'bout those U.S. Republicans?  Palin as late entry for president?  She would never take these so called "scientists'" at their word or "data" regarding particles, light, and time travel. 


i kinda love this too.  instead of using science to decipher science, let's use feelings and myth.  hell, let's use feelings and myth for everything.


Well, your so-called "science" is just one side of the story and they all need to presented to the public.  Did you know that there is a virtual monopoly in the scientific community regarding the necessity of "data" and "experimentation" to prove things?  But guess what?  The earth wasn't created in a controlled setting...or was it?  BAM!  Checkmate.  


So next you're going to propose "intelligent design" as a creation theory? Puddle thinking. And not appropriate for the forums. If you want a debate, take it to a private group.

ilikeflags
dannyhume wrote:
ilikeflags wrote:
dannyhume wrote:
corrijean wrote:

No religious discussion in the forums.


It's your soul but fine, "safe" topics it is...How 'bout those U.S. Republicans?  Palin as late entry for president?  She would never take these so called "scientists'" at their word or "data" regarding particles, light, and time travel. 


i kinda love this too.  instead of using science to decipher science, let's use feelings and myth.  hell, let's use feelings and myth for everything.


Well, your so-called "science" is just one side of the story and they all need to presented to the public.  Did you know that there is a virtual monopoly in the scientific community regarding the necessity of "data" and "experimentation" to prove things?  But guess what?  The earth wasn't created in a controlled setting...or was it?  BAM!  Checkmate.  


my science?  MY SCIENCE?  i'm a fucking literature teacher you self-righteous moron.  i've read your books though.  i got that part covered.  if heaven is full over dim-wits like you and sarah palin, please jesus, send me to hell. 

corrijean

People are happy to debate these questions in the Atheists and Theists group, so why don't you go there, dannyhume?

ilikeflags

can we please get back to our dicussion about how MsJean is travelling through time?

dannyhume
corrijean wrote:
dannyhume wrote:
corrijean wrote:

No religious discussion in the forums.


It's your soul but fine, "safe" topics it is...How 'bout those U.S. Republicans?  Palin as late entry for president?  She would never take these so called "scientists'" at their word or "data" regarding particles, light, and time travel. 


If you want to talk about religion or politics, there are plenty of groups to do it in.

Open Discussion Group

Christian Chess World

Atheists and Theists

to name a few.


They all kicked me out, mainly because I tried to insert a discussion on checkmateibeteau, another on MsJean, another on dinosaurs, and another on time travel in their forums but instead they referred me here, therefore I thought this would be the best thread to bring these topics up since everyone else had already brought it up first.  

MsJean inspires lots of creative discussions about things unrelated to MsJean.  Maybe that is what this all means. 

This forum topic has been locked