My first blog: Understanding everything in chess

Sort:
Cherub_Enjel

I wrote my first blog, and was wondering if more people could look at it? Right now it only has about 100 views.

https://www.chess.com/blog/Cherub_Enjel/1-how-to-understand-everything-in-a-chess-game

 

I am pretty sure my ideas are good and consistent, because I can't challenge them.

WillHeatb

Do we need another wheel design?

Cherub_Enjel

"Another" wheel design? 

Every beginner I have met has either never had a "wheel", or has had a very bad one that falls apart easily/contradicts many other established chess ideas and is inapplicable to too many positions to be practical. 

That's the thing - if there were some well-known, universal wheel in chess, I wouldn't ever post something like this. 

WillHeatb

That's what I said....

Cherub_Enjel

No - you asked a meaningless, vague question.

WillHeatb

Cherub_Enjel wrote:

No - you asked a meaningless, vague question.

Crap, it's the forum sheriff....quick stash the smuggled chess pieces.... Thank you for your opinion, it'll be taken at its full worth.... 🖒😎

Cherub_Enjel

That's ok - it doesn't matter if one 800 player doesn't care about my opinion.

WillHeatb

Cherub_Enjel wrote:

That's ok - it doesn't matter if one 800 player doesn't care about my opinion.

It's also ok if one snob stalks me..You want to be the president of my can club?

Cherub_Enjel

No thanks. I'm only here to discuss chess. 

WillHeatb

Then by all means, do so.

Cherub_Enjel

I could have blocked him, but responding periodically (without escalation) helps me keep this "advertisement" at the top. It's fine - there are many worse. 

ChePlaSsYer

Stop tryharding.

llama

I don't have time now, maybe later, but wanted to comment that the title made me chuckle... your first blog and you already explain everything? You should pace yourself, just explain a little at a time, keep people coming back for more tongue.png

Cherub_Enjel

Haha I was definitely tryharding a lot...

and by everything, I mean that although many players will not be able to understand/calculate a lot of details/variations behind ideas and moves, they'll understand the generalities and see that chess has a surprising amount of "structure" to it, and is not just a collection of coincidences. 

blueemu

 Nice blue bird. Here's another.

phpdXUeAl.jpeg

Your article should be useful for helping players achieve the transition from beginner to intermediate level... although you left out one of my favorite maxims:

Knights should move forward, but Bishops can be used sideways.

Or to put it another way:

You can hear a Knight coming, but not a Bishop.

Cherub_Enjel

Thanks - it definitely helped me get there. 

 

The main advantage of my system is that it's so simple - a lot of beginners are bombarded with information these days. And a lot of that info is useful, but they tend to forget the big picture, which causes confusion and poor moves. It should be the other way around, of course.

WillHeatb

Whip_Kitten wrote:

Will, you are one of the reasons why the chess.com forums suck now.  Go away.

lmao.

Cherub_Enjel

I updated the blog! It's gotten a bit more comprehensive, and I added some practical material to it. 

Bilbo21
Cherub_Enjel wrote:

I wrote my first blog, and was wondering if more people could look at it? Right now it only has about 100 views.

https://www.chess.com/blog/Cherub_Enjel/1-how-to-understand-everything-in-a-chess-game

 

I am pretty sure my ideas are good and consistent, because I can't challenge them.

What's the point when Stockfish exists.