Having a low rating doesn't mean you suck at chess, and even if it did that doesn't even come close to defining someone as an idiot.
my mind is blown that any chess player could be below a 1300
Sort:
Knuckleheads have different standards.
Why do people get so offended? OP is just voicing an honest thought.
Not to be mean. (there are many things I am horrible at) Hasn't anyone else seen someone do something and thought to yourself, how on earth are they that bad?
Yeah don't be haters guys, Kasporov_Jr is cool.
Who is taking offence at kasparoff jr not being able to understand something any average kid can figure out in a split second ?
Kasporov_Jr is no average kid, he had such a high rating when he was so young, when he was 5 he was probably better than you'll ever be in your life. Apply cold water to burned area.
Stop talking crap.
Kasporov_Jr wrote:
Nope, checked your ratings , and they all suck so basically your the only confirmed idiot
All you have is bullet and blitz ratings.Your online chess rating sucks greater than mine.So your the only idiot on here
Glass-Spider wrote:
Knuckleheads have different standards.
Only the Kasparov_Jr idiot.
Glass-Spider wrote:
Stop talking crap.
Agreed, Kasparov__Jr needs to be banned from this forum.
Just because someone is good at chess, doesnt mean they deserve to get banned.
0random wrote:
Just because someone is good at chess, doesnt mean they deserve to get banned.
You deserve to get banned for putting words in my mouth. Kasparov__Jr goes around bragging about his IQ and putting other people down. By calling him an idiot I'm only returning the favor.
so you lost 17 games on purpose to lower your rating so you could win a tournament for up to 1400. That is cheating and cause for being banned on chess.com Being an asshole is not... But maybe they should change the rules.
Mr_Moblhak wrote:
so you lost 17 games on purpose to lower your rating so you could win a tournament for up to 1400. That is cheating and cause for being banned on chess.com Being an asshole is not... But maybe they should change the rules.
I did not lose 17 games? I've only lost like 3-4 games in online chess that is because they were my first games in this website, and I was unfamiliar how the system worked since I was just used to playing blitz/bullet fast paced games.
I honestly dont care about Correspondence Chess since it's extremely boring, and not a valid rating to judge someone by , basically useless; I only have it to play on tournaments.
If anything, I should be praised for inpsiring you low-iq members who lack the intelligence to play chess at a high level, to continue trying to become better.
Kasporov_Jr wrote:
Mr_Moblhak wrote:
so you lost 17 games on purpose to lower your rating so you could win a tournament for up to 1400. That is cheating and cause for being banned on chess.com Being an asshole is not... But maybe they should change the rules.
I did not lose 17 games? I've only lost like 3-4 games in online chess that is because they were my first games in this website, and I was unfamiliar how the system worked since I was just used to playing blitz/bullet fast paced games.
I honestly dont care about Correspondence Chess since it's extremely boring, and not a valid rating to judge someone by , basically useless; I only have it to play on tournaments.
If anything, I should be praised for inpsiring you low-iq members who lack the intelligence to play chess at a high level, to continue trying to become better.
Idiot. Idiot. Idiot. Idiot.
That's what I got from what you said, at least.
Akatsuki64 wrote:
That's what I got from what you said, at least.
your an 1100 in Blitz lol, I thought after 1000 games you would improve, you pretty much wasted hundred of hours in your life for a mediocre, unrespectable rating lmaooo
Nope, checked your ratings , and they all suck so basically your the only confirmed idiot