my mind is blown that any chess player could be below a 1300

Sort:
0random
JGambit wrote:

it is funny when you see comments and can almost predict chess rating based on the content of the comment.

LOL so true

Akatsuki64
0random wrote:
JGambit wrote:

it is funny when you see comments and can almost predict chess rating based on the content of the comment.

LOL so true

LOL so true. Concerning that comment you can't predict Orandom has an online chess rating of 1679. There are too many exceptions for that premise to exist.

Akatsuki64

Kasparov Jr is only 18 or 19, he has yet to experience life, don't take him seriously.

0random
Akatsuki64 wrote:
0random wrote:
JGambit wrote:

it is funny when you see comments and can almost predict chess rating based on the content of the comment.

LOL so true

LOL so true. Concerning that comment you can't predict Orandom has an online chess rating of 1679. There are too many exceptions for that premise to exist.

Well I bet you didn't predict my USCF rating is 1900, but I predicted your online chess rating is 1300 LOL. 

Akatsuki64

I'm thinking about whether I should report you for this on your profile:

Chesserman63 All of you have been so fun to troll, and whenever I watch you rage, it makes my day! To alanzhang: Thank you so much for proving that one doesn't need to copyright their profile picture! You have proven successfully to me that Chess.com doesn't care what its members do, and that cussing in group notes is the right thing to do! To boy20111: Thank you for showing me the art of spamming. You showed me how to copy comebacks, and how to rage at people. You're the best friend I could ever hope for! To hsong1(Chesserman63): Thank you for showing me how to make new accounts after getting banned! You gave me a great proof that a rating of 1100 > rating of 1400. You also showed that when spamming, the more, the merrier. You showed me the value of friends, and the outcome when one has none. You showed me how to use an engine to cheat in online chess and then how to avoid cheat detection by playing a stupid move. Thank you, my (not) true friend!

Nice job, orandom, for being an absolute idiot. Good luck getting out of this oneSmile. Not really.

grihm1

I'm below 1300 and have beaten players 1300 and above. So what does that mean?  And whatever your answer is, that can also apply to players below 1300.  I mostly beat myself when I lose, so I'm working on correcting that.  Oh, and by the way, I have just started reading chess books for more variety of openings, middle games and endings.  

I've been playing off and on for about 30 years, but life kept interrupting.

0random
Akatsuki64 wrote:

I'm thinking about whether I should report you for this on your profile:

Chesserman63 All of you have been so fun to troll, and whenever I watch you rage, it makes my day! To alanzhang: Thank you so much for proving that one doesn't need to copyright their profile picture! You have proven successfully to me that Chess.com doesn't care what its members do, and that cussing in group notes is the right thing to do! To boy20111: Thank you for showing me the art of spamming. You showed me how to copy comebacks, and how to rage at people. You're the best friend I could ever hope for! To hsong1(Chesserman63): Thank you for showing me how to make new accounts after getting banned! You gave me a great proof that a rating of 1100 > rating of 1400. You also showed that when spamming, the more, the merrier. You showed me the value of friends, and the outcome when one has none. You showed me how to use an engine to cheat in online chess and then how to avoid cheat detection by playing a stupid move. Thank you, my (not) true friend!

Nice job, orandom, for being an absolute idiot. Good luck getting out of this one. Not really.

Ha lol. I'll bet you 5 bucks Chess.com support will say "Block the member" just like an IT support specialist will say "Shut down and restart your computer"

Akatsuki64

Yeah, well good luck with that. I told them you created multiple accounts. You might get out of it, you might not, don't be too sure of yourself.

Akatsuki64

5 bucks isn't a hefty wager.

Akatsuki64

I also hope you don't have too many friends on this site or people who know you've cheated, or hate you for that matter, because there is a page listing all the cheaters on this site. Have fun being a loser, not kidding.

http://www.chess.com/cheating?page=2

grihm1

I come from the time honored tradition of fair play when it comes to chess.  I mean, what are you really to gain by cheating?  Isn't the goal to get better?  And loss is instrumental to getting better at the game, and a win gives you confidence.  So... why would someone take pleasure in cheating?  I even acknowledge when someone have beaten themselves.

Cheating in chess is like pouring cheap wine in an expensive wine bottle... and boasting that you only drink fine wine.

Akatsuki64
grihm1 wrote:

I come from the time honored tradition of fair play when it comes to chess.  I mean, what are you really to gain by cheating?  Isn't the goal to get better?  And loss is instrumental to getting better at the game, and a win gives you confidence.  So... why would someone take pleasure in cheating?  I even acknowledge when someone have beaten themselves.

Cheating in chess is like pouring cheap wine in an expensive wine bottle... and boasting that you only drink fine wine.

Agreed. Looks like I scared Orandom also.

Akatsuki64

Sin isn't free, Orandom.

grihm1

I've always believed that chess was a true indicator of ones own thinking in life.  Do you make decisions too hastily, ill thought out, get too confident, over and underestimate situations you find youself in?

Cheating robs you of correcting these shortcomings.

Akatsuki64
0random wrote:
Akatsuki64 wrote:

I'm thinking about whether I should report you for this on your profile:

Chesserman63 All of you have been so fun to troll, and whenever I watch you rage, it makes my day! To alanzhang: Thank you so much for proving that one doesn't need to copyright their profile picture! You have proven successfully to me that Chess.com doesn't care what its members do, and that cussing in group notes is the right thing to do! To boy20111: Thank you for showing me the art of spamming. You showed me how to copy comebacks, and how to rage at people. You're the best friend I could ever hope for! To hsong1(Chesserman63): Thank you for showing me how to make new accounts after getting banned! You gave me a great proof that a rating of 1100 > rating of 1400. You also showed that when spamming, the more, the merrier. You showed me the value of friends, and the outcome when one has none. You showed me how to use an engine to cheat in online chess and then how to avoid cheat detection by playing a stupid move. Thank you, my (not) true friend!

Nice job, orandom, for being an absolute idiot. Good luck getting out of this one. Not really.

Ha lol. I'll bet you 5 bucks Chess.com support will say "Block the member" just like an IT support specialist will say "Shut down and restart your computer"

I also took a screenshot of your profile page, Orandom, just incase you thought you had some tricks up your sleeve.

grihm1

Amen to that my brother. Speak the truth.

Kasporov_Jr
Akatsuki64 wrote:
Kasporov_Jr wrote:
Mr_Moblhak wrote:

Live Chess - Blitz
1850
Live Chess - Bullet
1880
Online Chess
1107
Highest: 1307 (Apr 9, 2014) Avg. Opp.: 1309 Best Win: 1459 (OttoNemia) Today‘s Rank: #290,997 of 424,160 (29.8%) Timeouts: 32% (last 90 days) Time/Move: 4 hr Total Games: 24 (6 W/ 17 L / 1 D)
Chess960
1542
Tactics
1301
Chess Mentor
Unra

if your idiot mind actually went through my games, you would see that I lost 10+ games in a chess.com tournament due to stupid 24 hour format where I had to go; your case is invalid.

 

thats why bullet/blitz > online chess, any high rated player would know that, apparently, you dont which figures why your rating is low

I would suggest you improve your online chess rating before you start making claims about us being low rated players. Your highest rating was 1309, use whatever excuse you wish, you are still not excused, idiotic hypocrite.

I'm first place in my group in chess 960 online tournament, you mad? 

Akatsuki64
Kasporov_Jr wrote:
Akatsuki64 wrote:
Kasporov_Jr wrote:
Mr_Moblhak wrote:

Live Chess - Blitz
1850
Live Chess - Bullet
1880
Online Chess
1107
Highest: 1307 (Apr 9, 2014) Avg. Opp.: 1309 Best Win: 1459 (OttoNemia) Today‘s Rank: #290,997 of 424,160 (29.8%) Timeouts: 32% (last 90 days) Time/Move: 4 hr Total Games: 24 (6 W/ 17 L / 1 D)
Chess960
1542
Tactics
1301
Chess Mentor
Unra

if your idiot mind actually went through my games, you would see that I lost 10+ games in a chess.com tournament due to stupid 24 hour format where I had to go; your case is invalid.

 

thats why bullet/blitz > online chess, any high rated player would know that, apparently, you dont which figures why your rating is low

I would suggest you improve your online chess rating before you start making claims about us being low rated players. Your highest rating was 1309, use whatever excuse you wish, you are still not excused, idiotic hypocrite.

I'm first place in my group in chess 960 online tournament, you mad? 

I think you're mad. Keep this up and you'll get banned along with your already banned disciple Orandom.

Akatsuki64

Orandom not so random, that is.

pams1guy

what goes on in the mind of a below 1300 player?  I will tell you what goes through my mind.  I want to get beat that guy so bad that I lose patience and make simple mistakes...

This forum topic has been locked