Najdorf analysis please!

this is my first attempt gaining an outside perspective on my play and am excited to learn more about this great game! I've always hovered around the 1250-1500 range in chess (besides my horrendous blitz play), I feel this was one of the more solid games I've played, and I think I prefer to play in that positional sort of style, however, if tactical ambushes are kind enough to reveal themselves to me I also become filled with joy upon successful execution. But anyways, Just looking for any comments you may have about my game, strengths and weaknesses you may see are both welcome, thanks for taking a peak guys!

[COMMENT DELETED]

To be honest, there really is no need for detailed analysis. White played quite badly (not taking away anything from your win), and you took advantage of the blunders. All you had to do was keep your huge advantage, which you did.

I think black was dominating the entire game. I do not believe there is any need to ask for input as I do believe anyone can see that black was winning for the most part. White tried to copy black by playing h3 but clearly this game demonstrates that with out a clear reason those moves are a waste of time. Better to allow the pin. Don't get me wrong I am sure the Najdorf is a great opening for black, however, in this opening black apparently has a plan, and white simply does not.

All I am saying for the white side is avoid thoughtless moves like h3. Trying to stop a pin is not always a good reason to play those types of moves.

I know I just posted something that demonstrates my distaste for giving general feedback, however I believe in this case only general feedback is necessary. I do believe however, that my feedback is a lot better than merely saying something like, "You let your opponent get away with a lot in your opening," without really explaining why this statement means nothing. I at least explained why.

thank you for your comments, I did feel that my opponent made the game fairly strait forward for me to play and win, and " you let your opponent get away with a lot" is exactly the type of comment I was looking for, because i often feel that in many games I get into a winning position during the opening, and begin to play too passively in the mid-game worrying about things that I don't really need to worry about, losing to an endgame tactic that I miss or something. Did I miss any obvious tactical blows/ combinations where I opted for a more passive/ waiting move instead?

thank you Yuri, after looking for a bit I still can't exactly understand my reasoning for e6 over e5, I feel it was a combination of an imagined "elaborate" scheme I came up with of trying to dominate the light squares in the center anticipating he may trade his lsb on g4 to open the h file for his rook while also pulling my knight away from the d5 square, but looking at it now I think a trade of the Lsb's would be better because the rook doesn't seem to be able to make much use of that file. thank you for the tips, I will try some classical lines and post some games of me getting whomped

Yeah u shouldn't do the Najdorf because you have to memorize so many attacking moves that white can do, and you lose if you don't. 

Like I play 6.Rg1 and most people who don't know what they're doing with the Nadjorf lose really fast. 

You should play 2...e6 instead! and then play 4...a6

Thats what i do and i think it's rly fun