The guy got bored with the match. Certainly understandable. So many of you seem to think that the #1 hurdle to Chess improvement is it's difficulty. It's not: It's the motivation to play and improve. It takes a very strange and unique type of person to have such an insatiable desire to play chess that they would consistently get better.
This is a topic about the world chess championship match.
If all it took was passion, then we'd have millions of world champions.
Passion is a reliable way to improve past beginner level... that's all
"it's a fact that Ian's play was an absolute embarrassment to the world chess championship event".
Really? Prove it.
Facts are provable. They don't care about opinions. If you are personally embarrassed, that's on you.
In one press conference Ian described his blunder as "below GM level"
Everyone in the top 5 were GM level as young teenagers.
So basically we have a professional adult saying he preformed as badly as a child in the flagship event of his chosen profession... that's pretty much the definition of embarrassment.
Well then there is a very, very long way to go before it reaches "embarrassment". Examples have already been given of other competitions, like golf, where world class players miss a two inch putt. People who have NEVER played golf before can do better than that. Any chance Ians mistakes are on the same level as someone who has never played chess before?
So your argument is his chess games weren't embarrassing because someone missed a putt once. I have no response for that.
You must have a thing for man buns. Don't know why you'd bother defending him.