Neurodivergency and Chess Aptitude?

Sort:
Avatar of Temporary_Closed-backsoon
DiogenesDue wrote:

We lost 2 pages of posts...you'll never guess who got banned...

Finally!

Avatar of DiogenesDue
MyRatingIs1523IsBack wrote:

you don't even play on this site so yeah it would hard for you to get banned.

chess.com hands out false bans all the time i wouldn't take much stock into that.

Chess.com has an extremely low reversal rate on bans. They err of the side of caution far too much, actually...which is lucky for some people.

They do seem to catch many, though...

Avatar of Optimissed
MyRatingIs1523IsBack wrote:

DiogenesDue is not successful at anything when he's so bad at chess and spending a ton of time trolling on some random forums.

Avatar of DiogenesDue
Optimissed wrote:
MyRatingIs1523IsBack wrote:

DiogenesDue is not successful at anything when he's so bad at chess and spending a ton of time trolling on some random forums.

Always hitching your wagon to posters that will later disappear...when will you learn?

Avatar of DoYouLikeCurry
@diogenesdue yeah @myratingis1523isback says some odd things 😂😂
Avatar of DoYouLikeCurry
Be nice, lad. Not everyone can be 2200 myself included. But remember that if a 400 played either of you, they wouldn’t be able to tell the difference. As we get higher rated, the difference in skill between levels gets smaller because so does the player pool. You should know this. Sure, he’s not gonna beat you in a game, but I might. Or a 2000 might. So just chill, okay?
Avatar of DiogenesDue
MyRatingIs1523IsBack wrote:

imagine being deluded and not knowing you are trash at chess

In no universe is 1800 "bad at chess". I am just at the relative limit...1800 is about as far as can be gone without adding some pretty tedious study. I am not willing to make that compromise for a number. But you seem very interested in numbers...enjoy pursuing them, I guess.

Avatar of DiogenesDue
MyRatingIs1523IsBack wrote:

you're 1100 in blitz and 1200 in bullet which is definitely not 1800

You're zero in rapid and daily, which is definitely not 2300 (or even 1523 USCF, congrats on being rated 800 points higher online, though...must be hard to manage, but somehow you've done it). I trust you see your logical fallacy here.

Avatar of AhmedAryan
DiogenesDue wrote:
MyRatingIs1523IsBack wrote:

you're 1100 in blitz and 1200 in bullet which is definitely not 1800

You're zero in rapid and daily, which is definitely not 2300 (or even 1523 USCF, congrats on being rated 800 points higher online, though...must be hard to manage, but somehow you've done it). I trust you see your logical fallacy here.

...

really?

Avatar of DiogenesDue
AhmedAryan wrote

...

really?

I have played 32 games of bullet here, most of which which were just me showing a guest the speed of bullet chess. That's what...half an hour in ten years here? It's a meaningless rating, as meaningless as his zero rapid and daily ratings. As someone who's only meaningful rating here is rapid, you should probably understand this better.

Go be Aryan somewhere else.

Avatar of DiogenesDue
MyRatingIs1523IsBack wrote:

Rapid ratings are turbo inflated and easy to cheat. Nobody cares about your rapid rating

As you probably know better than most, blitz and bullet bots make this problem quite common in your preferred time controls...

Avatar of SoupSailor
I’ve played only 6 cheaters in 3,000 bullet games here. It’s really not a big issue; chess.com does a very nice job.

It’s a bit more common in rapid, but it doesn’t get too bad until well over 2,000.
Avatar of SoupSailor
Diogenes, did you ever play chess here? Or have you simply posted on the forums for the past 10 years?
Avatar of ice_cream_cake
SoupSailor72 wrote:
I’ve played only 6 cheaters in 3,000 bullet games here. It’s really not a big issue; chess.com does a very nice job.
It’s a bit more common in rapid, but it doesn’t get too bad until well over 2,000.

Agreed. Interesting that you put the comma in the 2000...not too often i see that

Avatar of DiogenesDue
SoupSailor72 wrote:
Diogenes, did you ever play chess here? Or have you simply posted on the forums for the past 10 years?

You can see my archive like anyone else. I played here in 2013 and 2014, then I started playing votechess exclusively here, until the VCL was went moribund after all top 20 teams in the league showed T3 match rates better than Carlsen (Chess.com won't clean up votechess, too messy for them to deal with). I also have played on Lichess (where my rapid rating hovers around 2000).

Avatar of 00DanteAleph00

How the hell you cheat on bullet?

Avatar of 00DanteAleph00

Diogenes, your name is an irony with the description of your profile grin

Avatar of DiogenesDue
00DanteAleph00 wrote:

How the hell you cheat on bullet?

You have never played video games where people had aimbots?

Avatar of 00DanteAleph00

I do not play videogames.

But I mean, people have to be so frustrated with their lifes to make the more sotisficated thing , until the point they cheat in bullet. lmao

Avatar of DiogenesDue
00DanteAleph00 wrote:

Diogenes, your name is an irony with the description of your profile

On the contrary, I have found a number of good and honest people here over the years. They are just drowning in a churning sea of ignorance, immaturity, and indifference to the forums' welfare wink.png.