New Clock Record

Sort:
1InYourFace

My new personal best, check mate in 13 seconds / 16 moves.

Abtectous
It’s easy at noob levels
1InYourFace

yeah, but it was 16 moves in 13 seconds. That's Neo in the Matrix speed.

Abtectous
I got a win in 4 moves in 7 seconds
Abtectous
(7 seconds on both players side)
1InYourFace

well..... unless you can post it..... I'll be holding on to this title for now. wink.png

1InYourFace

oh, and I didn't use any 'opening' gimmicks like getting check mate w/queen and bishop against a noob. But I'm sure somebody will post a faster speed than what I did. But for now, the air is sweet up here.

makki42
Omg….after reading these dork comments I cringe at the very thought of me being on this app…
YorsTruly
makki42 wrote:
Omg….after reading these dork comments I cringe at the very thought of me being on this app…

Yet you are in the app.

1InYourFace
Honchkrowabcd wrote:

I got 12 seconds in rapid at 1900 once

Uh, where is the checkmate?

Cosmavia
They resigned
1InYourFace
Cosmavia wrote:
They resigned

No offense, but resigning doesn't count. We're talking a full on check mate.

Cosmavia
I know i was just explaining
1InYourFace
Honchkrowabcd wrote:

I got a checkmate in 4 moves once

Everybody has. King's pawn opens, slide out the queen, slide out the bishop, then check mate. ZZZzzzzzzz doesn't count. No gimmicks. Straight game of chess with a checkmate, and post your results. Until then, I will sit on my throne until a 12 second check mate knocks me down.

1InYourFace

Slumming? Go pick on somebody your own size. And while you're at it, post your fastest checkmate. 12 seconds or better will easily shut me down.

leankata
Abtectous hat geschrieben:
It’s easy at noob levels

You are at noob levels.

Wilsons_World

It's impressive, but it matters less at lower elo rankings. It would be more noteworthy if it were against high-ranked players.

1InYourFace
Wilsons_World wrote:

It's impressive, but it matters less at lower elo rankings. It would be more noteworthy if it were against high-ranked players.

Actually it's the opposite. 2 high end players could never checkmate the other that quickly. Why? Because they are high end players and it's not possible to checkmate one under that short of time. I'm still holding at 13 seconds. Somebody beat my record so I can let this go. It took me years to play this fast. 16 moves in 13 seconds to mate! Chewed up and spit out.

YorsTruly

Here ya go my man game ended in 5 moves with checkmate in 7 seconds.

I beat your record.

Wilsons_World
1InYourFace wrote:
Wilsons_World wrote:

It's impressive, but it matters less at lower elo rankings. It would be more noteworthy if it were against high-ranked players.

Actually it's the opposite. 2 high end players could never checkmate the other that quickly. Why? Because they are high end players and it's not possible to checkmate one under that short of time. I'm still holding at 13 seconds. Somebody beat my record so I can let this go. It took me years to play this fast. 16 moves in 13 seconds to mate! Chewed up and spit out.

The reason a fast checkmate is more impressive at high Elo is because it’s so rare. At low Elo, quick checkmates happen because of mistakes, but at high Elo, they happen because of sheer skill. If a titled player got checkmated in 13 seconds, it would be a historic moment in chess. That’s why speed against strong opposition is more impressive than speed against someone likely to blunder.