New Licensing Agreement

Sort:
Avatar of Hanibaaal

What are your thoughts on the new chess.com licensing agreement released today (March 25, 2026)?

Avatar of Hanibaaal

This is what ChatGPT says:

The updates are mostly about tightening control and making things more explicit. Chess.com has clarified what data they collect, including sensitive categories like biometric data and government IDs for certain use cases, while also improving transparency with structured disclosures and opt-out signals like GPC. That part is a step toward compliance and clarity, even if the scope of data collection feels broader when spelled out.

Where things get heavier is on enforcement and legal protection. The platform now has stronger language around prohibited behavior, restrictions on automation and AI use, and the ability to pursue financial damages or legal action in cases like cheating in competitive events. Combined with mandatory arbitration and limits on where disputes can be filed, it clearly shifts more power toward Chess.com and reduces user leverage if something goes wrong.

Overall, the changes don’t radically alter how casual users experience the platform, but they raise the stakes for competitive players, developers, and power users. It’s a more mature, tightly governed system—safer in some ways, but also more controlled and less forgiving if you step outside the rules.

Avatar of MrChatty

Could you please move it to Site Feedback?

Avatar of Hanibaaal
MrChatty wrote:

Could you please move it to Site Feedback?

Done. There was already a similar topic there.

Avatar of MrChatty
Hanibaaal wrote:

Done. There was already a similar topic there.

You did not move it, you just reposted the content happy.png

Avatar of OCTOPUS_d6
MrChatty wrote:
Hanibaaal wrote:

Done. There was already a similar topic there.

You did not move it, you just reposted the content

When moving a thread, it breaks all those Following in Notifications. It's such a PIB. I hope ChessDotCom fixes that. I suspect all it takes is a multiline with first line being new link ID and second line being original link ID (relationally both post IDs are seen as keys) and that will end the breaks.

ADDED: It should not require tweaking of the script since only one line would ever be correct so only one relationally matches.

Avatar of TetrisFrolfChess

I know what you're saying, isolani-d4. My thoughts ... I clicked the command button I Agree & trust it's for the betterment of the site.