Even if they are, what are you expecting us to do with this information?
NOOBS AT CHESS

These Guys Are NOOBS
yerr dey are megaaaa nooooooooob i ammmm proooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

Unless they were innately gifted at the game from the very beginning, with an exceptionally high IQ. But yes, grandmasters were noobs at their beginning phase relative to their gameplay now.

I think white got confused with the danish gambit
I think black misused the underpromotion tactic
Black is just incapable of knowing that chess pieces have absolute values, which do not fluctuate throughout the game. Obviously, he places some sentimental value on the knight.

Peices dont have absolute values
Sometimes knights are better then rooks
No, pieces do have absolute values, which is just the main form of reference to show you whether a piece is typically more valuable than another. Obviously, pieces also have relative values that fluctuate throughout the game, dependent on the surrounding position and piece interplay.
These Guys Are NOOBS