OMG! I cannot break 1800

Sort:
llama47
Ziryab wrote:

Suffered two losses in a row yesterday, dropping to 1805. Then played this epic battle against a higher rated player.

https://www.chess.com/game/live/35419588579

 

Some instructive endgame ideas going on... but of course I'm always interested in that stuff (also I don't know much about french advance middlegames).

The fact that split pawns can hold back a king is useful knowledge. 78...e4 is an alternative winning move that highlights that.

This has similar themes:

-

 

Ziryab

Look carefully. I threw away the win with an inaccuracy. But, my opponent missed it premoving in time trouble.

I’ve spent time with Dvoretsky and other endgame books on those split pawns. My opponent clearly saw their potency as well.

Good variation.

llama47

Yeah, I saw a few improvements / errors. The engine said half of the ones I saw were not actually errors or improvements tongue.png but on some of the moves I was correct happy.png

Ziryab

The game itself had enough blunders to technically qualify as a blunderfest, but it felt like a well-played and complex game while it was going. Engines, of course, see through a lot of fog that hampers mortals.

llama47

It was a long battle with an interesting endgame. Sure it's no Carlsen - Nepo game 6, but these games are always a pleasure to win.

Ziryab

Things are looking up. A draw with a 2300+ pushed me to 1836, my highest rapid rating since last January.

https://www.chess.com/stats/live/rapid/ziryab/365

 

eric0022
Ziryab wrote:

I cannot break 1800 in rapid. I was there in August but cannot get back. Before I started playing so much 10 0 in Arena, I was over 1900.

I must be getting worse.

 

 

Times have changed apparently. Things are now already looking ahead.

Ziryab

Spent the last few days getting blitz back over 1800. I was mid 1900s a year ago, but have been in the low 1700s since a skid in late winter.

technical_knockout

custom seeks.  🙂

wollyhood
technical_knockout wrote:

custom seeks.  🙂

nahhhhhhhhh

then you will always know you kinda manipulated things to get a precise statistical result, after that hell you might as well become a politician or something!

technical_knockout

not really:  safeguarding yourself from losing 50 points every time doesn't mean you're going to win... if anything it forces you to go up against more skillful opponents, giving you a better estimate of your true strength than beating up on weaker players would.  

vihaan432

“Bump” 

lol

Ziryab

Beating a FIDE Master helps the rating. Just saying. Of course, it was a blunderfest according to Stockfish. Even so, I think I played a nice endgame.

https://www.chess.com/game/live/36436915671

 

Ziryab

Been a rough couple of months. I was briefly 1803 on 9 March and only today was again over 1800.

The Arena pool is tough.

llama51
Ziryab wrote:

Been a rough couple of months. I was briefly 1803 on 9 March and only today was again over 1800.

The Arena pool is tough.

You've won 42 of your last 50 rapid games!

Although I see that all happened in 1 week.

Wits-end

I realize it isn’t much from a lowly player as myself, but congratulations to you! 

Ziryab
llama51 wrote:
Ziryab wrote:

Been a rough couple of months. I was briefly 1803 on 9 March and only today was again over 1800.

The Arena pool is tough.

You've won 42 of your last 50 rapid games!

Although I see that all happened in 1 week.

 

Maybe I play too much.

Caffeineed
Must be terrible
Ziryab
Caffeineed wrote:
Must be terrible

 

It is terrible to lose to lower rated players, say 1200-1500. Of course, that’s exactly how those who are actually good feel when they lose to me.

Ziryab

The past month has been promising, but this morning I had dead lost positions against two 1200s, winning one on the clock and the other because my opponent started playing at the expected level. Then, I played well against a 1600 who played more like a 1000.