My opinion is we need chess content, and not these stupid altercations.
No one interested to learn something first hand for my book, for my superior knowledge?
I am here to offer advice and answer questions, but no one asks.
In that way, I don't see what creative discussion could arise.
Ok, I also will offer my superior knowledge I also offer advice and answer questions.
I think this is a good idea. We 1400 rated players like Lyudmil and I should show we are quite prepared to advise FMs GMs and the like how to best play.
as long as both arguing sides are on, argument is bound to happen. Lyudmil retaliated, we retaliated back, and war escalated lol
I say we nominate someone to play one correspondence game with Lyudmil on chess.com. Maybe a CM, one or two commented in his forums, and one is bound to be willing to play. If we could get one, maybe even an IM.
Of course, that's if Lyudmil would accept, which he should since one game couldn't take up that much time.
You are a disaster.
From now on, I will ONLY post chess content.
This is how one beats Komodo with black in a setup which GMs lose:
Don't thank me for the good game, enjoy.
If you want more of this: https://www.expert-chess-strategies.com/human-versus-machine.html
You are a disaster.
From now on, I will ONLY post chess content.
This is how one beats Komodo with black in a setup which GMs lose:
Don't thank me for the good game, enjoy.
If you want more of this: https://www.expert-chess-strategies.com/human-versus-machine.html
I thought you wouldn't want to accept the most simple request due to the fact that you are afraid to lose
Lose from WHOM?
As far as I know, Kasparov is already retired. 
Two days ago, I bought Human Versus Machine, Part 1 off amazon.com.
It is awesome..
I dig the section on pawns in The Secret of Chess, but the rest is over my head.
Well, over my head until I read https://www.amazon.com/Human-Versus-Machine-Stockfish-Komodo-ebook/dp/B0768G8R2C/ref=tmm_kin_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=&sr=
Now I see clearly.
It is a whole different world with GWTR involved!
Lose from WHOM?
As far as I know, Kasparov is already retired.
And he's still better than you...
That is what you think.
He is tremendous, but I have my bit of knowledge too.
That is what you think.
He is tremendous, but I have my bit of knowledge too.
False knowledge, actually: you’ve simply put overly complicated terms and centipawn values to concepts everyone already knows and understands. My solving and explaining your positions is proof of this.
So far, you did not manage to solve even a single position, so just shut up.
That is what you think.
He is tremendous, but I have my bit of knowledge too.
Yes. He is tremendous. That makes sense....
If by tremendous, you mean good at chess, he has a 1667 in correspondence chess on chess.com after playing over 120 games. He is anywhere from OK to good at chess, depending on what your standards of "good" are, but not "tremendous", whatever that means...
You are referring to Chesster, and I have been referring to Kasparov...
Anyway, Chess.com ratings seem a bit strange to me, some really good people have low ratings, while some really bad high ratings.
Engine use?
love is better than chess
Concerning the closed position terms present in 'The Secret of Chess', why would anyone think you could find a better manual on the KID and similar closed setups:
The closed position concepts the book formulates are very useful for real game play, indeed.
Putting that aside, the move times in your diagram prove this wasn’t a 2 2 game.
I have had at least 5+3.
SF probably 2+2.
It is just the header that says 2+2.
But are not you aware no one can play top engines at blitz?
You’ve already said no one can play top engines with a limited time control. That means no time control at all - another severe handicap for SF.
I meant no one EXCEPT me.
I bet SF will beat you 100-0, even with a piece down.