On “The Secret of Chessâ€
Sort:
hitthepin
Jan 12, 2018
0
#21
It’s just for safety, alright? Don’t kill me.
And your point is?
5 out of 5 for HvM!!!
Have fun, Comrades!
Jan 12, 2018
0
#27
GWTR escribió:
5 out of 5 for HvM!!!
Have fun, Comrades!
5 stars but only one user rated it, and unsurprisingly that user has only read books written by Lyudmil, so it might be a sockpuppet.
Playing specifically to beat specific engines (assuming this claim is even true) is hardly applicable since engines have an insurmontable advantage in tactics - top GMs have already demonstrated the likely outcome.
cellomaster8 wrote:
Guy has no proof. Complete scam
https://en.chessbase.com/post/the-secret-of-chess
https://www.welshccf.org.uk/article/325
https://www.expert-chess-strategies.com/human-versus-machine.html
All official reviewers agree:
- my books are original
- insightful
- interesting
- challenging to the mind
What else do you want from a chess book?
chesster3145 wrote:
Lyudmil_Tsvetkov wrote:
Weirder than that:
Lyudmil_Tsvetkov wrote:
Weirder than that:
SF does not see mate, -100cps black advantage on move 11, +400cps white advantage on move 12.
How am I able to see 12. Nf1, if SF is not able to?
You’re a liar:
You are giving SF 30 minutes here.
As I told you, you will regret your words one day.
Beware, because I am a marathon-runner.
No one can run faster and longer than me.
ArgoNavis wrote:
He's a joke, and not even a good one.
Yeah, but the SF guys are thanking me all the time: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/fishcooking/4mk8bLhd26Q
And my chess contents is the most complete in the world: https://www.amazon.com/Secret-Chess-Lyudmil-Tsvetkov/dp/1522041400/ref=tmm_pap_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=&sr=#reader_1522041400
prusswan wrote:
Playing specifically to beat specific engines (assuming this claim is even true) is hardly applicable since engines have an insurmontable advantage in tactics - top GMs have already demonstrated the likely outcome.
I am NOT a random top GM, you should be aware of that:
SF score changing from -100cps to +300cps in the course of 15 moves.
Who is smarter, me or SF?
What top GM is able to do the very same thing, any guess?
Jan 13, 2018
0
#38
If you want to post evidence, do on your forum. This forum is not meant for that.
Lyudmil_Tsvetkov wrote:
chesster3145 wrote:
Lyudmil_Tsvetkov wrote:
Weirder than that:
Lyudmil_Tsvetkov wrote:
Weirder than that:
SF does not see mate, -100cps black advantage on move 11, +400cps white advantage on move 12.
How am I able to see 12. Nf1, if SF is not able to?
You’re a liar:
You are giving SF 30 minutes here.
As I told you, you will regret your words one day.
Beware, because I am a marathon-runner.
No one can run faster and longer than me.
How dumb can you get? SF still sees it, and it clearly says "01:35" in the image, not "30:00".