Qh1 is not checkmate ....black king can move to e5 ..... Moreover I dont understand whats wrong with Rf5 ?
Qh1 is # the g7 Q covers e5
Rf5 is illegal the R's pinned
Qh1 is not checkmate ....black king can move to e5 ..... Moreover I dont understand whats wrong with Rf5 ?
Qh1 is # the g7 Q covers e5
Rf5 is illegal the R's pinned
Qh1 is not checkmate ....black king can move to e5 ..... Moreover I dont understand whats wrong with Rf5 ?
No, this is not so.(
dear friends I want to draw your attention to the fact that such a position is possible in a real game!!!
Subscribe? To what?
subscribe to my chess.com When you go to my profile there is displayed actions to track just click on it😎
Ah.. you mean follow you.
The most important thing for me is the thought that my blogs will gain a lot of views and comments because I am going to break into the top bloggers.😎
Don't want to be rude but the truth is truth ,
Top Bloggers?
Don't kid with me
I don’t want to quarrel with anyone. But why are you doing this? Why do you come to me in the comments and write nasty things to me? I’m still a person and I'm unpleasant to hear it.😔😓
This was a very difficult problem to try to solve in under minute considering it was mate-in-1. While it's doubtful one would ever see such a position in an actual game, only a retro-analysis, which undoubtedly no one has done, would reveal whether this exact position could be reached in actual play. But since problems aren't dependent on practical play, that issue is somewhat moot anyway.
I think aspiring for a Top Blogger status is a commendable goal. It takes a lot of time/work (or for some reason, just having a title), consistency and dedication.
This was a very difficult problem to try to solve in under minute considering it was mate-in-1. While it's doubtful one would ever see such a position in an actual game, only a retro-analysis, which undoubtedly no one has done, would reveal whether this exact position could be reached in actual play. But since problems aren't dependent on practical play, that issue is somewhat moot anyway.
I think aspiring for a Top Blogger status is a commendable goal. It takes a lot of time/work (or for some reason, just having a title), consistency and dedication.
Thanks so much for the support.😊
As for the position, you are right. But if it’s logical, then this position can be really achieved. Maybe it’s practically impossible but real.🤷♀️
This was a very difficult problem to try to solve in under minute considering it was mate-in-1. While it's doubtful one would ever see such a position in an actual game, only a retro-analysis, which undoubtedly no one has done, would reveal whether this exact position could be reached in actual play. But since problems aren't dependent on practical play, that issue is somewhat moot anyway.
I think aspiring for a Top Blogger status is a commendable goal. It takes a lot of time/work (or for some reason, just having a title), consistency and dedication.
But if it’s logical, then this position can be really achieved.
Not really. A position can be totally legal but unachievable in a game. Only a retro-analysis can demonstrate for sure whether it can be reached by any sequence of moves following the rules of chess. But, once again, problems don't require that.
I looked at the board and thought I solved it in under 10 seconds. But then realized that the rook cannot move after checking comments to verify(I didn't see the answer though). I then looked at the board for another maybe 1-2 mins before seeing Qh1#. It's so simple too, it's just a really really weird puzzle.
Subscribe? To what?
subscribe to my chess.com When you go to my profile there is displayed actions to track just click on it😎
Ah.. you mean follow you.
The most important thing for me is the thought that my blogs will gain a lot of views and comments because I am going to break into the top bloggers.😎