only 1% of chess players decided this position in 1 move!😜😮

Sort:
Ninella17
krudsparov написал:
Ninella17 wrote:
RedGirlZ написал:

Subscribe? To what?

subscribe to my  chess.com When you go to my profile there is displayed actions to track just click on it😎

Ah.. you mean follow you.

The most important thing for me is the thought that my blogs will gain a lot of views and comments because I am going to break into the top bloggers.😎

krudsparov
moukshgogoi wrote:

Qh1 is not checkmate ....black king can move to e5 .....          Moreover I dont understand whats wrong with Rf5 ?

Qh1 is # the g7 Q covers e5

Rf5 is illegal the R's pinned 

DZumpino94

Bf3 and Nb4 both win.

Ninella17
DZumpino94 написал:

Bf3 and Nb4 both win.

No, you are mistaken.

ericthatwho

Two Queens each side infighting deluxe. Not to mention illegal

Ninella17
moukshgogoi написал:

Qh1 is not checkmate ....black king can move to e5 .....          Moreover I dont understand whats wrong with Rf5 ?

No, this is not so.(

 

Ninella17

dear friends I want to draw your attention to the fact that such a position is possible in a real game!!!

ericthatwho

Still illegal

Ninella17
beafraid3 написал:

Still illegal

???

 

Ninella17
CRYYSIS написал:
Ninella17 wrote:
krudsparov написал:
Ninella17 wrote:
RedGirlZ написал:

Subscribe? To what?

subscribe to my  chess.com When you go to my profile there is displayed actions to track just click on it😎

Ah.. you mean follow you.

The most important thing for me is the thought that my blogs will gain a lot of views and comments because I am going to break into the top bloggers.😎

Don't want to be rude but the truth is truth , 

Top Bloggers? 

Don't kid with me

I don’t want to quarrel with anyone. But why are you doing this? Why do you come to me in the comments and write nasty things to me? I’m still a person and I'm unpleasant to hear it.😔😓

batgirl

This was a very difficult problem to try to solve in under minute considering it was mate-in-1.    While it's doubtful one would ever see such a position in an actual game, only a retro-analysis, which undoubtedly no one has done, would reveal whether this exact position could be reached in actual play.  But since problems aren't dependent on practical play, that issue is somewhat moot anyway.  

I think aspiring for a Top Blogger status is a commendable goal.  It takes a lot of time/work (or for some reason, just having a title), consistency and dedication.  

Ninella17
batgirl написал:

This was a very difficult problem to try to solve in under minute considering it was mate-in-1.    While it's doubtful one would ever see such a position in an actual game, only a retro-analysis, which undoubtedly no one has done, would reveal whether this exact position could be reached in actual play.  But since problems aren't dependent on practical play, that issue is somewhat moot anyway.  

I think aspiring for a Top Blogger status is a commendable goal.  It takes a lot of time/work (or for some reason, just having a title), consistency and dedication.  

Thanks so much for the support.😊
As for the position, you are right. But if it’s logical, then this position can be really achieved. Maybe it’s practically impossible but real.🤷‍♀️

batgirl
Ninella17 wrote:
batgirl написал:

This was a very difficult problem to try to solve in under minute considering it was mate-in-1.    While it's doubtful one would ever see such a position in an actual game, only a retro-analysis, which undoubtedly no one has done, would reveal whether this exact position could be reached in actual play.  But since problems aren't dependent on practical play, that issue is somewhat moot anyway.  

I think aspiring for a Top Blogger status is a commendable goal.  It takes a lot of time/work (or for some reason, just having a title), consistency and dedication.  

 But if it’s logical, then this position can be really achieved.

Not really.  A position can be totally legal but unachievable in a game.  Only a retro-analysis can demonstrate for sure whether it can be reached by any sequence of moves following the rules of chess.  But, once again, problems don't require that. 

ELO200

I looked at the board and thought I solved it in under 10 seconds. But then realized that the rook cannot move after checking comments to verify(I didn't see the answer though). I then looked at the board for another maybe 1-2 mins before seeing Qh1#. It's so simple too, it's just a really really weird puzzle. 

Tja_05

Ne3#

Tja_05

Oh wait the knight on f1

ZenChanSama

Kf6, or is that wrong?

Ninella17
ZenChanSama написал:

Kf6, or is that wrong?

wrong

Ancientinactive19

Bf3?

Ninella17
Ancient-bot написал:

Bf3?

no