It's all rather odd. Wouldn't they have been asked to show ID when registering for the tourney ? What was the point of the fraud, to win about 30 US $ ? Would they not have been allowed to play if they gave their real names ?
Sounds like a joke.
It's all rather odd. Wouldn't they have been asked to show ID when registering for the tourney ? What was the point of the fraud, to win about 30 US $ ? Would they not have been allowed to play if they gave their real names ?
Sounds like a joke.
The only explanation I can come up with is that they were stuck there and needed the money for the taxi back to the hotel or something. I think condemnation could wait until we know the facts of this case, or if it happened at all.
This can happen more often than you think. I played the same guy twice at a Houston tourney over a one year span with different names. It was in the U1400 section and he was 1500+ rated after winning the first time under "one name" and 1 year later, sandbagged as somebody else <1400 to win the second place section prize!. I reported this to the TD later on (realizing what had happened after the event when I entered my games in my database but surprisingly didn't find his name, even though I KNEW I played the guy!) , not sure if they ever pursued this, given that the event was already over.
To Fezzik's point, the big money should move over to the open and >2000+ rated sections ... that ways, a sandbagger/con artist would be more easy to spot, plus he wouldn't be ripping the organizers off for too much at the lower sections.
http://chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=7051