@1
"What are the signs that people have no aptitude for chess?" ++ Other interests.
"What if, despite learning about chess in various ways (books, videos, puzzles, etc.), they remained at a number like 500 ELO for several months (or over a year?)?"
++ They do not do the right thing. Blunder checking, lost game analysis...
"I wouldn't convince them to quit chess" ++ If they have no fun, then they should quit.
"It is clear that they are not naturally suited to chess"
++ Every human is naturally suited. It is a matter of dedication or lack of it.
"wasting their efforts" ++ Rather doing the wrong efforts.
What are the signs that people have no aptitude for chess?
What if, despite learning about chess in various ways (books, videos, puzzles, etc.), they remained at a number like 500 ELO for several months (or over a year?)?
I wouldn't convince them to quit chess, but
It is clear that they are not naturally suited to chess and are wasting their efforts.