players who hit and run... - Chess Forums - Page 4

ChiseledChessy · 2013-06-11T01:31:44-07:00

i hate hit and run players... even if i get lucky vs an opponent i have the courtesy and honor to give the opponent a rematch, the player who loses as black especially deserves to redeem themselves with the white pieces at the very least

bavarol

Jun 30, 2013

0

#61

Robik wrote:

I never give a rematch and I never ask for a rematch and I find the whole "rematch is a matter of honour and chessetiquette"-thing highly ridiculous

I find a bullet match (1/0) rather exhausting thats why I will always do a short break of sime min. before playing the next. As I am nearly every day 1 or 2 hours here online, I will rematch any of my opponents dozens of times in my chess.com career. So the whole rematch thing is IMHO anachronistic

Behave you like you behave in real life, no more, no less. Nobody demands 12345 rematches. Perhaps just one!?

I'll be content with those people, if they would say before they begin to play, that they don't offer rematch.

Politeness is not anachronistic.

Likhit1

Jun 30, 2013

0

#62

bavarol wrote:

Likhit1 wrote:

bavarol wrote:

The Question is another one, how many players, who hit and run, would do that in real life?

Internet is a nest of frustrated people, who think, they are more than they really are and something like online(live) chess gives that courage, they don't have.

Each one, who does it, increases my blocked list. It's easy, isn't it?

But there is something worst, people, who laugh, if they win.

Too many retarded people on this site. What a pity!

This actually made me laugh.

Yeah, then it could be said, you are one of them. On Internet you play like this, in the real life you play quite different.

lol.BS.I do whatever i want,real life or internet doesnt matter.I accept rematches when i want to and decline when i don't.Do you think people care when they're added to your blocked list?Ofcourse not,lol.People just laugh at your frustration,the frustration of being denied a rematch which you so hoped for.Accepting a rematch req is not mandatory,just live with it and stop whining because nobody cares about your thoughts on accepting or declining rematches.

bavarol

Jun 30, 2013

0

#63

Likhit1 wrote:

bavarol wrote:

Likhit1 wrote:

bavarol wrote:

The Question is another one, how many players, who hit and run, would do that in real life?

Internet is a nest of frustrated people, who think, they are more than they really are and something like online(live) chess gives that courage, they don't have.

Each one, who does it, increases my blocked list. It's easy, isn't it?

But there is something worst, people, who laugh, if they win.

Too many retarded people on this site. What a pity!

This actually made me laugh.

Yeah, then it could be said, you are one of them. On Internet you play like this, in the real life you play quite different.

lol.BS.I do whatever i want,real life or internet doesnt matter.I accept rematches when i want to and decline when i don't.Do you think people care when they're added to your blocked list?Ofcourse not,lol.People just laugh at your frustration,the frustration of being denied a rematch which you so hoped for.Accepting a rematch req is not mandatory,just live with it and stop whining because nobody cares about your thoughts on accepting or declining rematches.

You ask, whether someone cares about I say but you have quoted me, so, there is at least one person hehehe.

Frustration? No, I find, it's pathetic to behave on the internet different to the real life.

Why don't the people say that, who don't offer rematch?

Easy, because they wouldn't play often. ;)

Likhit1

Jun 30, 2013

0

#64

bavarol wrote:

Likhit1 wrote:

bavarol wrote:

Likhit1 wrote:

bavarol wrote:

The Question is another one, how many players, who hit and run, would do that in real life?

Internet is a nest of frustrated people, who think, they are more than they really are and something like online(live) chess gives that courage, they don't have.

Each one, who does it, increases my blocked list. It's easy, isn't it?

But there is something worst, people, who laugh, if they win.

Too many retarded people on this site. What a pity!

This actually made me laugh.

Yeah, then it could be said, you are one of them. On Internet you play like this, in the real life you play quite different.

lol.BS.I do whatever i want,real life or internet doesnt matter.I accept rematches when i want to and decline when i don't.Do you think people care when they're added to your blocked list?Ofcourse not,lol.People just laugh at your frustration,the frustration of being denied a rematch which you so hoped for.Accepting a rematch req is not mandatory,just live with it and stop whining because nobody cares about your thoughts on accepting or declining rematches.

You ask, whether someone cares about I say but you have quoted me, so, there is at least one person hehehe.

Frustration? No, I find, it's pathetic to behave on the internet different to the real life.

Why don't the people say that, who don't offer rematch?

Easy, because they wouldn't play often. ;)

You are just one of the many who whine about people who don't accept or offer rematches,but the truth is your whining won't make a difference because neither the people nor chess.com is going to change for you.You will always be a minority and nobody will take you seriously.People will keep on declining rematches and whether you consider that impolite,pathetic or whatever won't matter.

Irontiger

Jun 30, 2013

0

#65

bavarol wrote:

You ask, whether someone cares about I say but you have quoted me, so, there is at least one person hehehe. (1)

Frustration? No, I find, it's pathetic to behave on the internet different to the real life. (2)

Why don't the people say that, who don't offer rematch?

Easy, because they wouldn't play often. ;) (3)

(1) : childish semantics.

(2) : First of all, that's your opinion, and not a natural moral law that should apply to everyone. Second, internet chess is bound to be different, because, it's the internet, duh : you are playing behind a screen, you don't know the guy, etc. And third, though in real life it is rare to refuse a rematch, it is also rare to ask for one - if you keep asking rematches, the people in the club will know you as the weirdo.

Here I met some people that still asked for rematch at 6-0 score (in games where they are lost before move 10). I mean, come on...

(3) Lol.

I hereby announce that I am not going to offer any rematch whatsoever. (actually, I do it most of the times, but not always). Please block me if you do not want to play me.

Wanna bet I will still find players that do not share your vision of "manliness" to play against a coward like me ?

Avalon102020

Jun 30, 2013

0

#66

People will keep on declining rematches and whether you consider that impolite,pathetic or whatever won't matter.

Amen

Avalon102020

Jun 30, 2013

0

#67

Wanna bet I will still find players that do not share your vision of "manliness" to play against a coward like me ?

I know all chess sites pretty well and chess.com is the toughest concerning the block list, maximum 200 names allowed here. So if bavarol really gonna block all dudes who decline a rematch, he is in troubles after some days

Swindlers_List

Jun 30, 2013

0

#68

bavarol wrote:

I'll be content with those people, if they would say before they begin to play, that they don't offer rematch.

Politeness is not anachronistic.

lol, yeah, ok. Im going to inform everyone I play, who likely havn't even considered the idea of a rematch, that I don't do rematches..before the game starts.

Right, that idea is almost as stupid as this topic.

Dadnavy71

Jun 30, 2013

0

#69

Funny, I sometimes think of a block list as telling the blocked individual, you don't have the power to ignore, you require computer assitance. I do not employ block lists, I know they are there but really laugh and enjoy checking back (on previously minimized chat window) to see if they are still writing. If you answer or block, you empower them!

MrDamonSmith

Jun 30, 2013

0

#70

Hit and run. Sounds like a good description for a one night stand.

bavarol

Jun 30, 2013

0

#71

Irontiger wrote:

bavarol wrote:

You ask, whether someone cares about I say but you have quoted me, so, there is at least one person hehehe. (1)

Frustration? No, I find, it's pathetic to behave on the internet different to the real life. (2)

Why don't the people say that, who don't offer rematch?

Easy, because they wouldn't play often. ;) (3)

(1) : childish semantics.

(2) : First of all, that's your opinion, and not a natural moral law

O no, it's no moral law, it's a value, in the way you have been taught. It's called politeness, nothing more.

that should apply to everyone. Second, internet chess is bound to be different, because, it's the internet, duh :

You tell me something of childish semantics and you say that? Are you bipolar?

you are playing behind a screen, you don't know the guy, etc. And third, though in real life it is rare to refuse a rematch, it is also rare to ask for one - if you keep asking rematches, the people in the club will know you as the weirdo.

Here I met some people that still asked for rematch at 6-0 score

I f you have read my posts, I didn't say something of n times, so, why do you say me that?

(in games where they are lost before move 10). I mean, come on...

(3) Lol.

I hereby announce that I am not going to offer any rematch whatsoever.

If you say in advanced it's no problem, then I can decided, whether I want to play or not, so easy, isn't it?

(actually, I do it most of the times, but not always). Please block me if you do not want to play me.

Wanna bet I will still find players that do not share your vision of "manliness" to play against a coward like me ?

Of course you'll find players to play with, I said, the people like you and the people like me would be separated and perhaps happier

Knd regards ;)

purezen

Jun 30, 2013

0

#72

Come on, the definition of a "player" is someone who "hits and runs." Just ask any good looking woman who goes to nightclubs.

Irontiger

Jun 30, 2013

0

#73

bavarol wrote:

Irontiger wrote:

Second, internet chess is bound to be different, because, it's the internet, duh :

You tell me something of childish semantics and you say that? Are you bipolar? (1)

you are playing behind a screen, you don't know the guy, etc. And third, though in real life it is rare to refuse a rematch, it is also rare to ask for one - if you keep asking rematches, the people in the club will know you as the weirdo.

Here I met some people that still asked for rematch at 6-0 score

I f you have read my posts, I didn't say something of n times, so, why do you say me that? (2)

(in games where they are lost before move 10). I mean, come on...

Hint to read what someone else writes : try to understand what he says before replying, instead of assuming he is bipolar.

Assuming of course that we put aside the fact in some circumstances people have no choice but to not rematch :

(2) (answered first because it's shorter) : the point is that (some) rematchers are as annoying to me as non-rematchers are annoying to you. Stop posing as if rematching was a moral obligation that some cowards do not apply, this is just not true.

(1) unwarranted ad hominem. My point, which comes just after your answer, was that as the conditions are different from the chess club, the ethics are different. (Purposely) stupid example : OTB it is courteous to set the pieces in place after the game, there is no such obligation online (duh !). More relevant :

-In the chess club, you cannot be picky about your opponents because there are say 10 persons, 2-3 of them of your level. On the internet, you can find whoever you want.

-In the chess club, you (usually) know the person you are playing with. On the internet, no - on that site, even my "friends" ignore my real identity.

-OTB, you have to go to the chess club / tournament at a given date and time, but once you are there you have the guarantee to enjoy your games (no time stallers / no foul language / etc.) ; whereas on the Internet the fixed cost ("investement") of playing is pretty much nothing but the cost of each game ("marginal cost") is higher (risk of not enjoying the games).

etc.

I will not be feeding you anymore, sorry Mr. Troll.

Magnetic_Attitude

Jun 30, 2013

0

#74

bavarol wrote:

The Question is another one, how many players, who hit and run, would do that in real life?

Internet is a nest of frustrated people, who think, they are more than they really are and something like online(live) chess gives that courage, they don't have.

Each one, who does it, increases my blocked list. It's easy, isn't it?

You're right. If my soccer game finishes after 90 minutes, I immediately request a rematch. Or a nice weekend playing streetball. Winner stays...not, because I want my rematch!

Who knew chess was different. I can't agree to a single chess match, because of the holy rules of whatever I'm only an honourable man if I accept a rematch. Makes sense. The minimum amount of chess games socially acceptable is...2? If the same player wins both, of course. A tie means a 3rd game is required, right?

bcoburn2

Jun 30, 2013

0

#75

If I beat you then I have to offer a re-game - then if you beat me you have to offer me a re-game then----what's the use..If you don't get it- you never will.

bavarol

Jun 30, 2013

0

#76