Please Chess.com make a filter to avoid pair to new accounts.

Man, 
I have a record of 45-50% playing against opponents with my ELO.

But people with less than 60 days in their accounts beat me so easily that I cannot even understand what's happening.

It will be wonderful if chess.com has a filter like account age.
If you guys make this, I will turn it on right now.

So many persons create new accounts and they are not new to chess.com

There were threads like this one but it is highly unlikely to be ever implemented especially for regular games

Seems pretty obvious and the fact that it is still not implemented just indicates there is some purpose to not implement it

The elo calculation already takes account of the number of known past games, for the new player that is. So it should be easy to also make it basically leave the experienced player's rating largely unchanged (though I think that would also yield complaints, because it would make it essentially an unrated game for the experienced player).

If my code is correct, the author has met 2446 unique opponents by this moment including 428 accounts younger than 60 days by the moment they played their first common game. The author won 212, drew 34 and lost 182 games against these accounts

The site isn't likely going to add a seek filter but there's discussion about changing the underlying pairing algorithm to work in a similar manner.

The Glicko rating system already accounts for that. Players with high rating deviation (RD) values, which newer accounts, or account with few games in a pool, have

I think tournaments require this like "yesterday", too many accounts there who "joined 14 minutes ago" and get in the top 3 flawlessly

Tell us

Yes, you are on the forum

Please stop spamming the forums,

Exactly! Paid for a year membership and won't be paying again until they add this feature. They hate their players and won't add a support team. Kramnik not looking so crazy anymore. It seems like intentioned malicious negligence on chess.coms behalf.

What do you mean by that?

I said what I meant and meant what I said. I paid for a year subscription to a service that has no active support team. They allow these cheating new accounts enmass to ruin the experience and refuse to listen to the players asking for a simple feature to not be paired against new accounts. Where is the confusion? Vague question, ask something more specific if you need me to elaborate further.

The site has a full team of support members and there are support staff working the ticket queues all the time

Over 25,000 members opened tickets in August and were contacted by staff.

https://www.chess.com/article/view/chesscom-update-september-2025#Support

Regarding your other point, the site is unlikely to add a member filter but is looking at options to end up with something to address the underlying issue.

https://www.chess.com/blog/FairPlay/breaking-down-100-000-closures-a-month

I never hear from the support staff when I contact them, I get automated messages sometimes. But if they refuse to add a simple feature for players that are dealing with this abuse it becomes malicious negligence. If I am to be subjected to a sub par product in favor of these new accounts that play for free and cheat why would I continue to pay for the product? Nothing means anything anymore, the sanctity of the game has been violated by the egregious disregard of the players who try to conduct themselves with integrity. All for the sake of inflating account numbers for corporate spreadsheets to be counted as meaningful growth to investors and business proprietors.

Then genuine new accounts would be more likely to leave the site.