PICK ME I WILL CRUSH
Please make PogChamps less cringe...
I know this is a controversial topic so let me explain why I think they should remove PogChamps, or at least change it up a bit:
The original PogChamps was fine: Great interesting streamers, awesome reactions, everybody was having fun. But now, it's just cringe.
Before, all the streamers were nice. Now, it just feels like chess.com is trying to appeal to the simp demographic with all the streamers they chose. Choose some interesting streamers, or bring back old ones: Not these. Please.
yep
PICK ME I WILL CRUSH
of course you would crush sub 1000 players, if you were in a different tourney then we wouldn't know
I know this is a controversial topic so let me explain why I think they should remove PogChamps, or at least change it up a bit:
The original PogChamps was fine: Great interesting streamers, awesome reactions, everybody was having fun. But now, it's just cringe.
Before, all the streamers were nice. Now, it just feels like chess.com is trying to appeal to the simp demographic with all the streamers they chose. Choose some interesting streamers, or bring back old ones: Not these. Please.
wdym? There are a lot of interesting streamers and youtubers, like ludwig, xqc, mr.beast, and benjyfishy. idk what ur talking about when you say "simp" streamers. sure, there is pokimane but that is because she has like 3mil on twitch and it is really high. They chose even more diverse and interesting streamers this pogchamps. For example, they have logic to bring the music audience and they have daniel negreanu for the poker audience.
yes, logic and daniel negreanu was fine. I'm talking about pokimane and miko.
and neeko
chooses female streamers: appeals to simps
doesn't choose female streamers: sexist
???
i give you gold star⭐

im not talking about all female streamers
just the ones they chose specifically
so who else should they have picked?

imo every female streamer is gonna have simps here and there, you can't really prevent it
Hello yal, we meet again.
True, but they specifically chose the ones with the most simps.
imo every female streamer is gonna have simps here and there, you can't really prevent it
Hello yal, we meet again.
True, but they specifically chose the ones with the most simps.
no they didn't. they all have simps. chess.com chose the biggest streamers, and that is smart
imo every female streamer is gonna have simps here and there, you can't really prevent it
Hello yal, we meet again.
True, but they specifically chose the ones with the most simps.
no they didn't. they all have simps. chess.com chose the biggest streamers, and that is smart
my question is why is pokimane gonna donate to aops

Simp streamers are big streamers, so they did both... chess.com is smart and some of the players are no-talent eye candy
imo every female streamer is gonna have simps here and there, you can't really prevent it
Hello yal, we meet again.
True, but they specifically chose the ones with the most simps.
no they didn't. they all have simps. chess.com chose the biggest streamers, and that is smart
my question is why is pokimane gonna donate to aops
bruh that's a math competition organization. are you sure?
imo every female streamer is gonna have simps here and there, you can't really prevent it
Hello yal, we meet again.
True, but they specifically chose the ones with the most simps.
no they didn't. they all have simps. chess.com chose the biggest streamers, and that is smart
my question is why is pokimane gonna donate to aops
bruh that's a math competition organization. are you sure?
yes
I know this is a controversial topic so let me explain why I think they should remove PogChamps, or at least change it up a bit:
The original PogChamps was fine: Great interesting streamers, awesome reactions, everybody was having fun. But now, it's just cringe.
Before, all the streamers were nice. Now, it just feels like chess.com is trying to appeal to the simp demographic with all the streamers they chose. Choose some interesting streamers, or bring back old ones: Not these. Please.