it has been more then a min1111
post your hesitation here

I think your mistake was g5, because really it opens you up immediatly, I haven't seen master play those move to just attack a bishop ee.

In that Bg5 line, h6 followed by g5 is quite normal. The dubious idea was f7-f5... but I needed to tempt White into an unbalanced position. THAT part worked out...

Good game.
At move 7, you commented "This is the way to strike back against 6.Bg5"
What did these moves do to 'strike back' at the move 6. Bg5?

all lot of the time what i try to do when i castle kingside is to h3 that blocks invaders out and then do something like kh2 to get out of a bc5>f2 pin and protect the h3 pawn from being assaulted by bishops and queens.Now i hesitate when i do such a thing because if black hasn't castled it can result in a nasty fishing pole as demonstrated in the game below.

Good game.
At move 7, you commented "This is the way to strike back against 6.Bg5"
What did these moves do to 'strike back' at the move 6. Bg5?
White developed his c1-Bishop to g5, an unusual spot (it usually hangs around e3). I kicked it back to h4. Now it`s out of touch with the Q-side. I followed through with c7-c5, knocking White`s d-Pawn out of the center. Now, on the e, d, c, b and a-files, White only has ONE Pawn covering dark squares... the one on b2. Meanwhile, I had a Bishop on g7 (whose line-of-sight has been increased by removing White`s d-Pawn), Pawns on e7 and d6, a Queen out on a5 (or c5) and a Knight coming to c6... ALL OF THEM pressuring dark squares.
This allowed me to create a lot of dark-squared pressure, which fully compensates for the weaknesses created in my K-side by the h7-h6 and g6-g5 manoever... especially with White`s dark-squared Bishop sealed out of play on g3.

I don't hesitate for no goddamn moves, I'm a pawnslayer and exchange sacker, ain't no foolin' around!

Thanks emu.
You said the e, d, c, b and a pawns only have 1 that was covering dark squares; the b-pawn. What about the d-pawn? Does it not count because there are pawns covering the same squares?
Pushing the h pawn to move the bishop is one of those moves I was weary of before I started studying chess. Now I use it with the idea usually being to force my opponent to decide how important the piece is to him.
I never thought about the contact it loses with the q-side when it retreats like this. Thanks for making me aware of that idea.

Thanks emu.
You said the e, d, c, b and a pawns only have 1 that was covering dark squares; the b-pawn. What about the d-pawn? Does it not count because there are pawns covering the same squares?
I was speaking of the position AFTER ... c5, dxc5 when White's d-Pawn has been knocked out of the center and will soon be recaptured by Black, since after Black's Qa5 pinning the c3-Knight, White has bigger things to worry about than his "extra" Pawn on c5.
Yeah, when I play a move like h7-h6 (or a7-a6), it's usually done to force the opponent to choose between diagonals or spheres of influence... does he want to retreat to h4 and maintain the pin, at the cost of losing touch with the other flank?
It goes by in slow motion. It actually took 30 secs.