preparing for my rival

Sort:
Avatar of thegoldenknight2003

I currently have a rival who is about as good as me if not better. I have a few problems I have to fix if I want to defeat him though, he is a really aggressive player and loves to play white so first of i need to find the best way to beat him as black, also I'm a fairly good player but i sometimes make moves to fast without calculating and right after that move i see were i went wrong. plz help.

Avatar of Farm_Hand

Bacon often posts a list of useful tips.

For example the first post here:

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/i-need-to-be-better-i-need-a-book

Avatar of cellomaster8
I’m a fairly good player hmm... I guess so lol.

Sorry that was passive aggressive
Avatar of thegoldenknight2003

 yes cellomaster8, I'm just quick to think and sometimes it costs me the game. I need help not your passive aggressive comments.

Avatar of IMKeto
thegoldenknight2003 wrote:

I currently have a rival who is about as good as me if not better. I have a few problems I have to fix if I want to defeat him though, he is a really aggressive player and loves to play white so first of i need to find the best way to beat him as black, also I'm a fairly good player but i sometimes make moves to fast without calculating and right after that move i see were i went wrong. plz help.

First piece of advice...STOP with using terms like "aggressive" The only style at your level is "blundering"  Now to answer your question:

Opening Principles:

  1. Control the center squares – d4-e4-d5-e5
  2. Develop your minor pieces toward the center – piece activity is the key
  3. Castle
  4. Connect your rooks

Tactics...tactics...tactics...

The objective of development is about improving the value of your pieces by increasing the importance of their roles. Well-developed pieces have more fire-power than undeveloped pieces and they do more in helping you gain control.

Now we will look at 5 practical things you can do to help you achieve your development objective.

They are:

  1. Give priority to your least active pieces.
  • Which piece needs to be developed (which piece is the least active)
  • Where should it go (where can its role be maximized)
  1. Exchange your least active pieces for your opponent’s active pieces.
  2. Restrict the development of your opponent’s pieces.
  3. Neutralize your opponent’s best piece.
  4. Secure strong squares for your pieces.

 

Don’t help your opponent develop.

There are 2 common mistakes whereby you will simply be helping your opponent to develop:

  1. Making a weak threat that can easily be blocked
  2. Making an exchange that helps your opponent to develop a piece

 

Pre Move Checklist:

  1. Make sure all your pieces are safe.
  2. Look for forcing moves: Checks, captures, threats. You want to look at ALL forcing moves (even the bad ones) as this will force you look at, and see the entire board.
  3. If there are no forcing moves, you then want to remove any of your opponent’s pieces from your side of the board.
  4. If your opponent doesn’t have any of his pieces on your side of the board, then you want to improve the position of your least active piece.
  5. After each move by your opponent, ask yourself: "What is my opponent trying to do?"
Avatar of thegoldenknight2003

why should i stop using the term aggressive?

 

Avatar of IMKeto
thegoldenknight2003 wrote:

why should i stop using the term aggressive?

 

1. It doesn't apply.

2. It will be used incorrectly.

3. It does nothing for your improvement.

4. At your level, the only style is blundering.

 

 

Avatar of Shock_Me
It is unhelpfully diverting your attention away from the very good advice Mr Bacon is offering toward some notion that there is a special approach you should take against an “aggressive player”. Bacons advice applies equally well whether you call his style “passive”, “aggressive”, “tactical” “positional” or whatever. The fact is that until a player becomes fairly advanced, he really has no style to speak of- the games are characterized by blunders and missed tactical opportunities. Your approach should be as Bacon suggests. Forget about style
Avatar of thegoldenknight2003
IMBacon wrote:
thegoldenknight2003 wrote:

why should i stop using the term aggressive?

 

1. It doesn't apply.

2. It will be used incorrectly.

3. It does nothing for your improvement.

4. At your level, the only style is blundering.

        at any level the only style is blundering just less so the further you go up the ranks. No human can master chess

 

 

Avatar of aa-ron1235

yeah but sub 1200 just suck at chess

Avatar of Shock_Me
OP, go ahead and ignore the advice. You won’t find any better. Seek in vain the special plan to beat an “aggressive” beginner. You won’t find it and you will continue to lose to your rival. You choose.
Avatar of thegoldenknight2003
Shock_Me wrote:
OP, go ahead and ignore the advice. You won’t find any better. Seek in vain the special plan to beat an “aggressive” beginner. You won’t find it and you will continue to lose to your rival. You choose.

 Really I never said i wasn't taking his advice.

Avatar of IMKeto
thegoldenknight2003 wrote:
Shock_Me wrote:
OP, go ahead and ignore the advice. You won’t find any better. Seek in vain the special plan to beat an “aggressive” beginner. You won’t find it and you will continue to lose to your rival. You choose.

 Really I never said i wasn't taking his advice.

 

What you will lose is your love and enjoyment of the game.

Avatar of Shock_Me
Well you’re arguing with his first piece of advice which was to STOP using terms like aggressive
Avatar of thegoldenknight2003
IMBacon wrote:
thegoldenknight2003 wrote:
Shock_Me wrote:
OP, go ahead and ignore the advice. You won’t find any better. Seek in vain the special plan to beat an “aggressive” beginner. You won’t find it and you will continue to lose to your rival. You choose.

 Really I never said i wasn't taking his advice.

 

What you will lose is your love and enjoyment of the game.

       that doesn't make any sense

 

Avatar of IMKeto

I even took the time to expand on my "Opening Principles" cheat sheet....and right now...<sniff> Im not feeling appreciated...

Avatar of thegoldenknight2003
IMBacon wrote:

I even took the time to expand on my "Opening Principles" cheat sheet....and right now...<sniff> Im not feeling appreciated...

       I appreciate your advice the only problem is Shock_Me is mocking my intelligence.

Avatar of IMKeto
thegoldenknight2003 wrote:
IMBacon wrote:
thegoldenknight2003 wrote:
Shock_Me wrote:
OP, go ahead and ignore the advice. You won’t find any better. Seek in vain the special plan to beat an “aggressive” beginner. You won’t find it and you will continue to lose to your rival. You choose.

 Really I never said i wasn't taking his advice.

 

What you will lose is your love and enjoyment of the game.

       that doesn't make any sense

 

 

As long as you continue to ask the wrong questions, you're going to get frustrated.  You're trying to define "aggressive" when you aren't even using it correctly.  Your other post is asking "How to play the Sicilian" when you haven't mastered the basics yet.  I'm not trying to tell you what to do, i'm simply offering advice you need.  You will get plenty of people that will give you the advice you want.  

Guaranteed...at some point, your going to get a reply from someone rated 800 telling you to play the Sicilian Accelerated Dragon (Because its aggressive)

Avatar of IMKeto
thegoldenknight2003 wrote:
IMBacon wrote:

I even took the time to expand on my "Opening Principles" cheat sheet....and right now...<sniff> Im not feeling appreciated...

       I appreciate your advice the only problem is Shock_Me is mocking my intelligence.

He is telling you the same thing i have said, just in a different way.  I get accused of being "mean" at times because im blunt.  Thats all shock_me is doing...being blunt.

Avatar of cellomaster8
Yeah mainly it’s just tactics and trying not to make the most blunders at 800