Queen vs 2 Rooks

Sort:
Avatar of tygxc

2 rooks can attack a pawn twice and thus are generally stronger than 1 queen

Avatar of thollon

It is normally a draw when it is two rooks versus a queen, but in certain circumstances two rooks can be better

Avatar of eric0022
newengland7 wrote:

1 rook is usually better than two queens.

 

In a minority of positions, yes.

 

 

Avatar of HelloIAmInheaven
i think 2 rooks are better,because you can do un escalier
Avatar of Play-banned
eric0022 wrote:
newengland7 wrote:

1 rook is usually better than two queens.

 

In a minority of positions, yes.

 

 

he muddled his words up, its 2 rooks are better than 1 queen, not 2 queens are better than 1 rook. That position is very hard to get to, there is no way a good chess player cannot see the back rank mate, and in less than 0.1% of positions is that true. He is also incorrect because he said 'usually' and 0.1% is rare and not usual. That statement is <0.1% true.

Avatar of davidkimchi

queen for me

Avatar of Kowarenai

2 rooks can be usually better but it would depend on the coordination and compensation that the position has to offer for the defending side. if the one with the rooks has 2 pawns while the queen side has nothing then the rooks win clearly but if the queen has double passed pawns and rooks are not coordinating well then the queen would reign more dominant against the rooks

Avatar of ArthurEZiegler

The Queen is very powerful and versatile, but you would not want to trade it for a single Rook. For that reason two Rooks can combine forces and chase the Queen all over the board and make threats that can't be responded to by exchanging pieces, unless, of course, you can get two Rooks in exchange for the Queen

Avatar of Laskersnephew

Rule 1: "It all depends on the position"  But the more minor pieces there are are in the board, the better for the side with the queen. At least that seems to have been Bobby Fischer's belief

Avatar of Empery64
I think 2 rooks would be better than 1 queen because they can work together like a conveyor belt to drive your opponent’s king into checkmate. Furthermore, my friend sacrificed his queen for 2 rooks and in his game review, that was a Brilliant Move.

Avatar of Rimuru
2718a wrote:
TRACKER4 wrote:

Here is a game in daily matches in which even with Queen against rook I couldn't win,all are requested to make their comments as to where did I go wrong.

https://www.chess.com/daily/game/263332940

There was a fortress.

In move 80, he should have played Kh4 instead of Qd4 activating the king as a piece to help.

Avatar of Wonderdragon88
it atually depends on the situation
Avatar of bro0020
I will do a educated guess it says what scenario I would persuade say queen
Avatar of colecollector
Rooks
Avatar of ruerter

It maters how safe the king is

Avatar of KeSetoKaiba

This should be helpful:

Avatar of i-AGC

ITS KAIBA CORP!

And queen is better duh

Avatar of i-AGC

*positionally

Avatar of theF7_Checkmate

One rook is better than 3 queens

Avatar of Chessnut20150709
I think 2 rooks are better because their points add up to 10 which is more than a queen which is 9 points.