Used to be titled, "Question for @Absolute_Best," now it's a rhyming battle.

I mean its against the rules for having more than having 1 account and it looks like she cares more for her points and notes since almost all her notes are written by herself

Darkbrah, please leave behind your childish antics. Go onto chesskid, to play with people of your age group

y do u have to be so annoying?

I mean compare @Absolute_Best's bullet and blitz rating chart to @Ultimate_Fighter's blitz and bullet rating chart and then look at their notes

It’s my persona. I am in troll mode. 

 I am not sure whether to report. We shouldn‘t even be discussing this. They may just be similar, as @agaprni said.

I throw anti troll mode on you.

yea i agree

Hold off on the report.

I agree also.

Ok, hear me out. Even if they turn out to be the same person, which is near impossible to prove with substancial evidence, what do you gain from reporting them? They havent used the account in month, whoever is behind it. You really gain nothing from reporting someone who is only guilty of having two accounts. Maybe you gain some mild satisfaction because you have something against the person, but we aren’t that petty. We should act like refined people. 

How does having a lot of followers admit to being an attention seeker? Honestly. Are you saying that because people friend request me I seek a ton of attention? Or that I'm seeking attention by sending a ton of friends requests?

You said it yourself. 
“I give this online personality a big ego in order to give me entertainment value. Someone said a big ego lowered my reputation, but it raised my likability, or something like that. I'm not really sure. In summary, I know I have a big ego online.”

”My ego is an act. Most people don't do what I do, but I basically created a likeable character, thought up some funny things and posted them. People liked this character, and eventually I became better with it.”

You have an inflated ego coupled with an arrogant personality online, because people like it. It gives you, I believe you called it, “entertainment value.” You want to have the friends and followers and the people who eagerly follow your cyclists and walker drama.

I try my hardest not to be arrogant. Yes, I have a big ego, but that doesn't mean arrogance. That's one of the things I avoid.

So you admit it then. So why try to debate me in your previous comment? How about we abandon this childish quarrel. 

I've admitted having a big ego in several threads.

But I'm almost never arrogant without being sarcastic, and I try my hardest to not give that impression. 

I haven't admitted anything in the previous comment that I haven't admitted before.

Bith of you, calm down

@agaprni

What did you say I admitted to doing?

confuse this therad

Regarding said player --

2200-2300 at online blitz is a respectable amateur rating, but let's be realistic here. Any entry-level NM can hit that rating easily.

Many FMs, even, can secure a 2500-2600 blitz rating without too much effort at all. These aren't exactly world-class accomplishments that we're talking about.

Is a 2300 blitz rating something for an amateur player to be proud of? Absolutely.

Is it indicative of a prodigious talent? Unfortunately, no.

To imply otherwise is to insult to the actual prodigies who're out there, actively competing and properly earning their accolades, at the 2700+ FIDE level. Incredible players like Alireza Firouzja and Andrey Esipenko, and so many others.