20792 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I was listening to a video lecture given by GM Bojkov, and he was mentioning the White player Cardon, who was playing against Timman, and he said: "in that period, the 80ies, Cardon was around 2380, which counting inflation is like a 2500 today..."
I don't understand the comment, because in my opinion, inflation is related to a way a government tries to cover its debts printing more money (if I do it is illegal, but if the government does it, then it is ok!). But the rating couldn't be inflated, because it should be a mathematical measure of the strength of a player against others.
Further, a 2500 today, with all the computer training, and the coaches, chances to play against strong computer engines, or also in strong tournaments, should be stronger than a player in the 1980ies.
So my idea is that a 2300 today is strong like a 2500 of the 1980ies, and not vice-versa.
What do you think?
The irony is Carlsen's rating is deflated compared to his playing strength.
Perhaps humour was being introduced.
this has been covered into the ground
I think that was a joke
I think he meant that in the hierarchy of players at that time, the position of a 2380 player (percentile rank) was similar to the position of a 2500 player nowadays.
He probably meant their core skills (chess skills with the exception of opening preparation) were similar too.
I have played online chess since the internet began and the one thing I notice is overall chess skill has gone up with all chess players, globally. But among top players, their ratings have inflated a lot. You see this on ICC and Playchess where there are many 3000 rated players. But 10 years ago....a GM on Playchess by username of Hawkeye, was considered very good and his blitz was only 2700 or 2800.
What more to say? If a lot of strong players from there switch here, I believe the top ratings will inflate.
It could mean more people are cheating now.
Is the article to read on this issue. If you believe in the Sonas hypothesis, and that today's players are not that much more skilled than yesteryear's, then rating inflation is about 100 points, roughly what GM Bojkov observes.
by Diakonia a few minutes ago
The site sucks
by Diakonia 5 minutes ago
Trump will solve chess
by EscherehcsE 6 minutes ago
Crushing Computer3-HARD in good style here, on chess.com.
by MGleason 10 minutes ago
What's the difference between a Super GM and a GM?
by DonaldoTrump 11 minutes ago
How to take decisive action
by ArtNJ 14 minutes ago
by ThrillerFan 15 minutes ago
7/22/2016 - Not Just Surviving, Winning
by Doggo93 19 minutes ago
by ImpulsiveGeniusII 21 minutes ago
Aron Nimzowitch--my favourite grandmaster
by Robert_New_Alekhine 24 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!