1. the term was coined by a bunch of sore losers. And all you are doing is exposing yourself at one of them! Again, by that flawed logic we shouldn't have any time controls at all. Meanwhile the whole point and difference is the time controls themselves. And there is absolutely no excuse for flagging when there is an increment. What that shows is that ALireza was the better player in confusing his opponent no matter what position was on the board!!
2. I don't think Carlsen would resign a match if he had a chance to flag. You probably tell yourself that in your mind, and if he does, Then yes he is another fake in a fake sport that will never be respected by society.
3. Ironic you are telling me that while you call Alireza a dirty flagger and insist he should of taken a loss instead of winning based on time control which is the whole reason for this event. Otherwise like his opponent, you should take your sore loser crybaby attitude back to classical.
4. Absolutely. He would be a weakminded coward who would never become world champion if thats something he thinks he is supposed to do. Fabiano not only looked like the loser Nepo looked like in the WCC for doing what he did, he also looked like a complete fraud! And he made the whole event look fraudulent. I'm glad Nepo lost!
alireza never confused his opponent and you keep hallucinating these statements as i never said time shouldnt be apart of the game. it wasnt coined by sore losers but pretty much everyone in the modern age as its a flag in a position where your opponent is completely losing and shouldnt deserve to win. thats not calling alireza a bad player but ultimately just saying he was lucky his opponent didnt move quick as he had the win right there.
2. if he had the chance to flag he would but again that wouldnt change the fact that it would be nothing but a dirty flag if his position is pretty much being a wood pusher in a losing position nothing else but hoping desperately his opponent loses on time.
3. again i am insisting his opponent should have found the winning move, i have never stated that alireza should resign but rather that he was being desperate for his opponent to lose on time. its not being sore but stating the obvious which literally me, hammer, krush, and many people could agree on as alireza didnt deserve the win at the resulting position.
4. you are making more off topic statements and seeming like a troll exposed to everyone in the community as no one is a fraud, just let them be and learn to shut up for once instead of raging at everyone calling them fakes. by kasparovs attitude logic or your "logic" then pretty much everyone in the world is weakminded despite the person again who said that statement being the world champion which ruins the whole point and makes it weird
1. If he never confused his opponent why did he flag especially when there is a 2 second increment? Alirez'as moves up to that point, and Just the way Alireza was making gestures and expressions, the crowd standing behind him, all of that threw his opponent off and Alireza exploited it. As he should, because contrary to what you believe, this was not a "friendly" match. These were tow professionals playing for their careers and fans who want a competitive match.
2. It absolutely does change things. It means he is world champion instead of a coward and fraud who insults his own fans by throwing matches to desecrate the sport.
3. You absolutely have insisted that otherwise you wouldn't use such a disparaging term to describe his play and demean his rightful and professional win.
4. You've already exposed youserlf as someone who was banned and created another account which you smurfed for 200 games on. You expose yourself as an unsporting an uncompetitive player constantly and this thread is just another example. You are simply bad for the sport but the stereotypical chess player unfortunately.
1. he didnt confuse his opponent, his opponent was more trying to find the move and i think he even spotted it but he was trying to make sure he wouldnt get checkmated as aliereza posed a mating threat. the crowd was standing behind both of them and didnt affect anything at all and yes they are professionals but again let them end how they did instead of raging about it along with many other players everytime, thats just how it went deal with it.
2. fabiano caruana isnt a coward or fraud but a person who tried his best and became one of the very few in the modern elite to become a WCC that takes dedicated and he should get more recognition than some insults from a random troll account on this site.
3. it can be demeaning and alireza would agree that his technique wasnt good at the end but i am having no intentions with disrespecting him but pointing out what happened. i would literally say the exact the same difference if alireza flagged instead as its not being biased.
4. again you are a troll which most of the community doesnt even agree with and have you ever noticed that pretty much you are the only person i ever argue with? i have not argued nor said any negative things towards anyone in forums except when going against some of the most weirdest and repetitive statements by your incredible criticism here
It's not using two hands to hand off the captured piece to the 2nd hand. That's a common technique.
he actually took the black pawn with his left hand and moved his piece with his right. It was an illegal move but I always though the onus was on the player to call that out and stop the clock. But I guess if the arbiter sees it he can intervene in that situation. ...
FIDE has very strict guidelines for arbiters and if they have enough of them, they pretty much step in during most rule violations.