Rematch rules

Sort:
Laskersnephew

I can't believe so many people can't recognize trolling when they see it! Well done, sir!

alpo100k
666Buffchix wrote:
alpo100k wrote:
John_Proctor wrote:

I feel sorry for you for making snippy comments toward people trying to have a discussion. 666buffchix agrees so I'm probably on to something here

Duly noted. One person agreeing with you means nothing. In fact, a million people agreeing with you means nothing. People are free to play as they see fit. There are times when I don't have time for a rematch, regardless of how bad my opponent may want one. There were times when I had my opponent beat, strategically and numerically, and yet I made one blunder that cost me the game and was never granted a rematch. And guess what? That's okay.

No, it's not "okay". Have you no competitive spirit? I think they should be forced to play you again and again until you stop blundering and get the win over them.

lol

ExecuteOrder_66

Rematch accepted.

Adjust-Fire
What a whiner! Sounds like Democrat whining because Hillary lost.
ExecuteOrder_66

There is only one solution to this. Execute Order 66.

alpo100k
Adjust-Fire wrote:
What a whiner! Sounds like Democrat whining because Hillary lost.

Finally, the guy who looks to inject politics into a conversation in a completely irrelevant way!

Adjust-Fire
In honor of this question. I just rejected a rematch. 👍
MikeCarnevale

Yes, mandatory rematches forever..never mind someone might have something else to do, like go to work, make dinner, take the dog out...no limits on rematches either, just keep it going forever!

 

ExecuteOrder_66
666Buffchix wrote:
One-a4 wrote:
ExecuteOrder_66 wrote:

There is only one solution to this. Execute Order 66.

Can you stop making silly trolling comments everywhere please.

Yeah! Enough is enough! These boards are meant for discussion.

I totally agree.

Laskersnephew

I totally disagree. These boards are meant for whatever purpose people want to put them to. I assumed that the OP was trolling with a parody of the kind of clueless loser who thinks he is entitled to make you play him again, whether you want to or not. Perhaps I was wrong. Perhaps he is the kind of clueless loser who thinks he is entitled to make you play him again, whether you want to or not. In either case, what's the point of "discussing" such an idiotic idea?

Laskersnephew

Look, wining one game doesn't prove you're really the better player, so rematches should be mandatory. And any idiot can win two lucky games in a row, so two out of three isn't really adequate either. Come to think of it, I've seen the weaker player luck his way to three wins, so best of five isn't really a fair test either . . . in fact, only a lily-livered coward would refuse to give you an infinite number of rematches!

alpo100k

Sacrifice those that don't accept rematches to our Dark Lord Satan! Shemhamforash!

Laskersnephew

Accepting a game on Chess.com is like checking in at the Hotel California. You can check out but you can never leave. Rematches until death!