Hi, just copy and paste this link into your friends chat window: http://www.chess.com/article/view/chess-rules--basics It says the following: Occasionally chess games do not end with a winner, but with a draw. There are 5 reasons why a chess game may end in a draw:
Repetition Draw


There was this kid who got me in time trouble and then stopped taking notation when he had 20 minutes left. He started blitzing me in a completely drawn rook ending and it ended up being three fold repetition. But he said I could not prove it because there was no notation taken. Still ended up fine.

KillaBeez: I think this is an ok tactic to try. I think when _either_ player goes below 5 minutes, you don't have to continue taking notation. The tradeoff is that your opponent also waives his right to make a 3-fold repetition claim.
I don't know the rules around claiming, for example, a perpetual check draw. I have the impression though that you're supposed to stop the clock and get an arbiter (TD) over to the board.
Anybody else know the answer?
Hi, I was playing a friend who seems to think that he could claim a draw if he moves his king (or any other piece) back and forth to the same squares 3 moves in a row. Is this correct? I was reading about the repetition rule and am under the impression that it is only if all the pieces are in the same position for 3 moves (not necessarily one after the other) that you can claim a repetition draw.
I would be happy to know because as soon as he's losing he starts to repeat his move which forces me to attack that square
Thanks, Aidan