Research Participants / Researchers Wanted

Sort:
Avatar of 1618_of_PsyChess

this is great practice for me... thank you for helping me get this information out there
... i am doing my best to be "clear and concise." happy.png

Avatar of 1618_of_PsyChess

Hello! I appreciate the link!!! Thank you @Omek

Avatar of 1618_of_PsyChess
ghost_of_pushwood wrote:

Didn't they fight the Daleks?

And I'm pretty sure we've all met the Primordial Musician...

 

When was "the primordial musician" mentioned in this thread? 👁👁.... "they" play a significant role in my research project!

Avatar of 1618_of_PsyChess
DamonevicSmithlov wrote:

I had to look up codons. I was all like... wait... what? Dang it, gotta look up something else.

And if you don't mind me asking, what did you learn? 😁🙏😊

Avatar of Barefoot_Player

OK - we have a player who is rated less than 1000 doing research into chess development.

This does not inspire confidence in me. 

 

On the other hand, if this person has a PhD in psychology, and is just lousy in chess, that might inspire me.

But if he can't, or will not, provide that information (and so far he has not), I suspect then he is a troll.

My BS detector is ringing loudly here wink.png

 

 

Avatar of Ziryab
Barefoot_Player wrote:

On the other hand, if this person has a PhD in psychology, and is just lousy in chess, that might inspire me.

 

Not many children have Ph.D.s in any field.

Avatar of 1618_of_PsyChess
Barefoot_Player wrote:

OK - we have a player who is rated less than 1000 doing research into chess development.

This does not inspire confidence in me. 

 

On the other hand, if this person has a PhD in psychology, and is just lousy in chess, that might inspire me.

But if he can't, or will not, provide that information (and so far he has not), I suspect then he is a troll.

My BS detector is ringing loudly here

 

 

Good Afternoon @Barefoot_Player(!!!),

   Thank you for commenting on this thread! I greatly appreciate it, and i'm looking forward to reading your thoughts and comments as the conversation progresses!

   As far as "providing evidence" for what i am doing, I am happy to say that I have been collecting all of the relevant "evidence" that i can collect, that would "provide credibility" to "my conducting developmental research... in chess." happy.png I have been speaking with family members, mentioning that i am preparing to "set up a research project," and they are advising me how to prepare the necessary paperwork to "establish my credibility." Credible evidence is definitely on the way, and will be made available to all who are interested in the project.
   In the mean time, i would be more than happy to speak with you and build some sense of rapport(!!!). I enjoy engaging in conversations! so please feel free to "approach me", my friend happy.png

Looking forward to seeing you around on this thread! Best of luck in Your games as well(!!!)!

 

Take Care, Barefoot_Player happy.png

Emilio A.

Avatar of 1618_of_PsyChess
Ziryab wrote:
Barefoot_Player wrote:

On the other hand, if this person has a PhD in psychology, and is just lousy in chess, that might inspire me.

 

Not many children have Ph.D.s in any field.

Do you think children could be eligible to major in chess

Avatar of EscherehcsE

Is it just me, or am I starting to feel like Charlie Brown trying to kick the football that Lucy is holding... happy.png

Avatar of 1618_of_PsyChess
EscherehcsE wrote:

Is it just me, or am I starting to feel like Charlie Brown trying to kick the football that Lucy is holding...

how so? would you mind elaborating? happy.png