Yes, such as the seriously considered opinion that Topalov's move 11. Kf8 instead of 0-0 was a "mouse slip"...
Most Recent
Forum Legend
Following
New Comments
Locked Topic
Pinned Topic
Watching games from the Sinquefield Cup, it is impossible not to notice in the chat the criticising of top ten players. For example a few people saying Vachier-Lagrave took to long on his second move.
Unlike us amateurs, GMs analyse overwhelming amounts of information before their moves and 2. Nc3 was a surprise. Do these people really think that Vachier-Lagrave was thinking "uh what pieces can I move again?" NO, he was going through huge databanks of memory of the Closed Sicilian and Carlsen's games.
I also saw people calling Nakamura a bad player after his loss to Caruana... #5 in the world... #5. What would happen if he played these critics? They wouldn't be calling him a bad player then!
Also making idiotic move suggestions with simple refutations then saying OMG can't believe a GM missed that when they play a different move... it is maddening to think these gurning buffoons think they saw something a grandmaster didn't... sigh.