"Man i dont believe there isnt any titled player in the world who doesnt know at least the names breyer variation and panov botvinnik attack."
Many old books (70s) in Spain don't contain the name of the openings variants:
For example: P.Cherta, Defensa Siciliana Variante Najdorf (Sicilian Defense Najdorf variation)
In old books the Richter-Rauzer attack is the Anti-Dragon Variation, etc.
The Scheveningen is contempled as Sicilian e6+d6 system etc.
In this moments the study of the opening is very fashionable but there remain players that it pass. In the last Open I played had a Catalan Master (NM) that use Bird with the Leningrad-Dutch pawn structure in any game with white.
The point is selecting a single aspect of chess knowledge and use it to determine if any player is cheating is go faraway.
) and that is indeed one I did not know the name of because it isn't very major (in my repetoire, at least). I cannot tell you the names of very many 1. d4 openings outside of my responses as black (e.g. Tartakower variation in the QGD) because I've never played 1. d4; I forget which opening is the Pirc or Modern because the move orders are similar. Oh well.
Are there a chance that a super GM, Carlsen or whatever chess player, cheat this way with higher technology? The good news about this new gadget cheating, is that all the old players I respect, Karpov, Fischer, Kasparov, Capablanca, Morphy, Alekhine, etc. were real geniuses, who worked hard to achieve his goals. They are giants to me, today chess players, really, I don't know. Technology is the good, the bad and the ugly to chess.