Shameless Bullet Players 🤬
Sort:
Merely different methods to stimulate dopamine release. Why do you think they call it a puzzle rush? 😉
Apr 25, 2021
0
#1123
Semiahmoo wrote:
Merely different methods to stimulate dopamine release. Why do you think they call it a puzzle rush? 😉
Isn’t it because you have to rush through puzzles?
Apr 25, 2021
0
#1125
Ironically I increased my bullet rating by around 150 points or more since I made this post .
Lol
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:
Ironically I increased my bullet rating by around 150 points or more since I made this post .
Lol
Bullet is easy when you improve your time management
Apr 25, 2021
0
#1127
Nennerb wrote:
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:
Ironically I increased my bullet rating by around 150 points or more since I made this post .
Lol
Bullet is easy when you improve your time management
Yep which I am quite bad at
Apr 25, 2021
0
#1128
Woah you talked about blitz. I just realised both of us have played a blitz game in the past. Interesting
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:
Woah you talked about blitz. I just realised both of us have played a blitz game in the past. Interesting
Yes
Apr 25, 2021
0
#1131
B1ZMARK wrote:
yes i too have blitz games ive played in the past
Interesting. But not against me .
Apr 25, 2021
0
#1133
B1ZMARK wrote:
Lol I know was just making fun of your wording
Yes xd ik
Apr 25, 2021
0
#1135
little_guinea_pig wrote:
ikr
The guinea pigs in your profile picture look like the ones I have
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:
InsertInterestingNameHere wrote:
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:
InsertInterestingNameHere wrote:
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:
jaivantjohntitus wrote:
I don't agree with your stupid logic
You are too naive to understand my logic .
Okay buddy, there’s a reason only one person agrees with you out of all of these people.
As I already mentioned . It's my opinion . And I know not many are gonna agree. But it doesn't change the truth
“The truth” your logic is very flawed.
It's not . You are yet to put forward a convincing point to prove me wrong .
Then I guess the flying spaghetti monster must be real because you have yet to put forward a convincing point to prove me wrong.
Apr 25, 2021
0
#1138
winston_weng wrote:
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:
InsertInterestingNameHere wrote:
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:
InsertInterestingNameHere wrote:
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:
jaivantjohntitus wrote:
I don't agree with your stupid logic
You are too naive to understand my logic .
Okay buddy, there’s a reason only one person agrees with you out of all of these people.
As I already mentioned . It's my opinion . And I know not many are gonna agree. But it doesn't change the truth
“The truth” your logic is very flawed.
It's not . You are yet to put forward a convincing point to prove me wrong .
Then I guess the flying spaghetti monster must be real because you have yet to put forward a convincing point to prove me wrong.
The flying spaghetti monster is obviously real.
Now write a 10 paragraph essay.
GBTGBA wrote:
I think I’m taking a break from playing bullet after finally reaching to 1500 again after hundreds tries. I will try play one rapid a day while watching TV.
Brilliant Idea. Rapid is best time control for recreation. Can do other things like snacking, social media, TV, etc simultaneously with playing chess.
Apr 25, 2021
0
#1140
JackRoach wrote:
winston_weng wrote:
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:
InsertInterestingNameHere wrote:
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:
InsertInterestingNameHere wrote:
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:
jaivantjohntitus wrote:
I don't agree with your stupid logic
You are too naive to understand my logic .
Okay buddy, there’s a reason only one person agrees with you out of all of these people.
As I already mentioned . It's my opinion . And I know not many are gonna agree. But it doesn't change the truth
“The truth” your logic is very flawed.
It's not . You are yet to put forward a convincing point to prove me wrong .
Then I guess the flying spaghetti monster must be real because you have yet to put forward a convincing point to prove me wrong.
The flying spaghetti monster is obviously real.
Now write a 10 paragraph essay.
You can't make the basis for an argument giving the point that because your argument is yet to be disproved that it is sound. You need to realize the already existing arguments which have already made such existences of spagetti monsters a low probability. However, you can convince me if you provided the right evidence, although this is unlikely.
just avoid the bullet then :ghost