Shameless Bullet Players 🤬

Sort:
Avatar of Rodgy
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:

I know am gonna get a lot of criticism for my views but I still want to express them. I have zero respect for players who's bullet is around 700+ points above their rapid / blitz/ daily. 

The reason being , is that it simply implies that you are bad at the game and just rely on your fast mouse , better internet to win games and you do not possess the skills that a person of your rating must have  . 

Now don't get me wrong . I understand there are people who just play bullet all their life and have never really played any other format , hence they are underrated in other formats. I haven't included them in my criticism . I see players being 600-700 blitz after around 3000 games and 1400+ bullet after a similar game span. This is ridiculous.

Says the person who has played over 2000 games of bullet.

Avatar of Tails204
GBTGBA wrote:

For people not knowing what to do in hyperbullet: you just need to defend. Someone has to attack someone has to defend. Don’t know how to attack ? No problem. Just defend.

True! But I don't play Hyperbullet (except 4-player chess). My time control is 1+0.

Avatar of Anonymous_Dragon
Roger436 wrote:
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:

I know am gonna get a lot of criticism for my views but I still want to express them. I have zero respect for players who's bullet is around 700+ points above their rapid / blitz/ daily. 

The reason being , is that it simply implies that you are bad at the game and just rely on your fast mouse , better internet to win games and you do not possess the skills that a person of your rating must have  . 

Now don't get me wrong . I understand there are people who just play bullet all their life and have never really played any other format , hence they are underrated in other formats. I haven't included them in my criticism . I see players being 600-700 blitz after around 3000 games and 1400+ bullet after a similar game span. This is ridiculous.

Says the person who has played over 2000 games of bullet.

It's irrelevant

Avatar of Kadenstarr

300 left

Avatar of Anonymous_Dragon

My latest bullet win by 0.1 second.

https://www.chess.com/live#g=13627915367

 

Avatar of EhmTae
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:
EhmTae wrote:
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:

I know am gonna get a lot of criticism for my views but I still want to express them. I have zero respect for players who's bullet is around 700+ points above their rapid / blitz/ daily. 

The reason being , is that it simply implies that you are bad at the game and just rely on your fast mouse , better internet to win games and you do not possess the skills that a person of your rating must have  . 

Now don't get me wrong . I understand there are people who just play bullet all their life and have never really played any other format , hence they are underrated in other formats. I haven't included them in my criticism . I see players being 600-700 blitz after around 3000 games and 1400+ bullet after a similar game span. This is ridiculous.

I don't understand, aren't bullet games long? I only play bullet, and it never seems like a fast mouse has any sort of factor. Why do long games require less skill?

Were you high on weed while typing this ?

no, I had just misread the rating on my profile... so nevermind lol

 

Avatar of modipaduollemmers

I think this is the forum with the most answers ever

Avatar of AussieMatey

Definitely the most in the shortest amount of time. 10 days for 1736 posts equals nearly 9 pages per day.

Avatar of Nennerb
AussieRookie wrote:

Definitely the most in the shortest amount of time. 10 days for 1736 posts equals nearly 9 pages per day.

Yes

Avatar of Nennerb

1738