Should opening books be allowed?

Sort:
blackfirestorm
billgill0 wrote:

I dont need to say sorry for what I have said, I feel better having said it! Donna did you use books when you played me, if you did they did not help you very much did they!!! just play the game as it comes you wont feel so guilty then if you win on your own merit!...lol


That game we played was many moons ago and no I didn't but I have been doing more recently.

Besides I do not feel one tiny bit guilty for using a database for the one and only reason my opponent has the option of doing the same!!

banjoman

1. book lines only get you so far

2. you have to understand the opening, not just know the moves, in order to play an opening profitably

case in point: in this game I get schooled in the 2 knights' opening, despite the "advantage" of knowing theory up to move 11 or so.  It would have been much better for me to have played a less critical line, in which the theory isn't known:

3. it is still a lively contest in online chess even if one or both players use an opening book

4. it's a good way to learn openings in preparation for OTB play (a lot more interesting than just memorizing a line in a non-competitive situation

billgill0
[COMMENT DELETED]
Kupov3

A-MEN 

 

what?

blackfirestorm

chess is chess ... 

over the board chess has 1 set of rules while cc has another set of rules 

Why is that so hard to understand??

PrawnEatsPrawn
[COMMENT DELETED]
blackfirestorm
[COMMENT DELETED]
billgill0
[COMMENT DELETED]
Kupov3

played yerself suckers 

blackfirestorm

wow it was only a picture of a horse laughing?? 

Patzer24

Please keep the forum thread to the original topic. It was really getting out of control.

billgill0

Someone did not like the truth!

tryst
blackfirestorm666 wrote:

wow it was only a picture of a horse laughing?? 


Copyright infringement, blackfirestorm666. The horse called chess.com.

blackfirestorm
Patzer24 wrote:

Please keep the forum thread to the original topic. It was really getting out of control.


Well yes I do agree but when people come into these forums accusing players of cheating because they use a database how is that allowed??

Or is it just the privileged few that get away with comments like that 

blackfirestorm
billgill0 wrote:

I did not know how many members cheat on this site but reading these notes there are loads of you that DO !


Not sure but to me that looks like a blatant attack on anyone using a database??

billgill0

Donna, I think I remember YOU were warned by chess.com for using an unauthorised database and they were going to get rid of you but let you stay because you said sorry and would not use it again! so you are not as clean as you make out are you!

blackfirestorm

Well excuse me but I have stopped using that particular database and am now using the games explorer as provided here on this site.

You got a problem with that???????????????

blackfirestorm

Yes well AnthonyCG when someone accuses me of cheating here on chess.com because I use a tool that chess.com themselves provide then am I suppose to sit back and say fine???

blackfirestorm
billgill0 wrote:

Donna, I think I remember YOU were warned by chess.com for using an unauthorised database and they were going to get rid of you but let you stay because you said sorry and would not use it again! so you are not as clean as you make out are you!


And just to clarify this Bill I was NEVER gave a warning for using that database seeing as it was me that showed it to them and asked!!!!!

BABS and many many other group leaders also used that database for vote chess so don't come in here telling me that I was ready to be booted for cheating!!!! 

Unless you know something I don't????????????????????????????????????

billgill0

You say what you want Donna and read as many chess books and use every database you want to, I dont care because I will never play you or let you play in one of my teams I would not want any of my members using help to win a game of chess that should be fun and players trusting each other to play fairly, that is my last  comment on the subject.