Question: is this the Alapin?
Stuff Non-Chess Players Say
Sort:
I have no idea.
I don't know. I don't study openings. I'm about to go make a table of contents for the 4000+posts we have on this forum. So if anyone wants to find anything, it'll be here. That's going to take a while though...
Oct 23, 2014
0
#3585
akafett wrote:
@ Dragon: Free for a game this evening? Around 11 EST?
YES let's do it, I accept! See you online!
Oct 23, 2014
0
#3586
camberfoil wrote:
I shall...jk
You shall be free for a game with akafett too? Lol. Looks like that's what you meant. <_< heh
Oct 23, 2014
0
#3587
but wrote:
I don't know. I don't study openings. I'm about to go make a table of contents for the 4000+posts we have on this forum. So if anyone wants to find anything, it'll be here. That's going to take a while though...
That would be intriguing. Chess.com should give you a trophy for that.
dragonair234 wrote:
camberfoil wrote:
I shall...jk
You shall be free for a game with akafett too? Lol. Looks like that's what you meant. <_< heh
I meant I shall judge him, following his request of the opposite.
dragonair234 wrote:
but wrote:
I don't know. I don't study openings. I'm about to go make a table of contents for the 4000+posts we have on this forum. So if anyone wants to find anything, it'll be here. That's going to take a while though...
That would be intriguing. Chess.com should give you a trophy for that.
It would be interesting (but hard) to create a directory for all of the content on all of the forums. Even though there is already a grouping of categories for threads, a more detailed directory would group individual posts as well as individual threads.
Then the non-chesser builds a tower with the rooks, queens, and a king
Oct 23, 2014
0
#3591
awesomechess1729 wrote:
dragonair234 wrote:
but wrote:
I don't know. I don't study openings. I'm about to go make a table of contents for the 4000+posts we have on this forum. So if anyone wants to find anything, it'll be here. That's going to take a while though...
That would be intriguing. Chess.com should give you a trophy for that.
It would be interesting (but hard) to create a directory for all of the content on all of the forums. Even though there is already a grouping of categories for threads, a more detailed directory would group individual posts as well as individual threads.
That's ummm "but's" job. He already claimed it! xD
dragonair234 wrote:
awesomechess1729 wrote:
dragonair234 wrote:
but wrote:
I don't know. I don't study openings. I'm about to go make a table of contents for the 4000+posts we have on this forum. So if anyone wants to find anything, it'll be here. That's going to take a while though...
That would be intriguing. Chess.com should give you a trophy for that.
It would be interesting (but hard) to create a directory for all of the content on all of the forums. Even though there is already a grouping of categories for threads, a more detailed directory would group individual posts as well as individual threads.
That's ummm "but's" job. He already claimed it! xD
I meant all of the content on the chess.com forums instead of just this thread.
I wonder if he gets kicked alot.
@ Dragon: Just sent you a message.
I guess "online" chess games refer to 1 day/move minimal, right?
Yes.
awesomechess1729 wrote:
dragonair234 wrote:
awesomechess1729 wrote:
dragonair234 wrote:
but wrote:
I don't know. I don't study openings. I'm about to go make a table of contents for the 4000+posts we have on this forum. So if anyone wants to find anything, it'll be here. That's going to take a while though...
That would be intriguing. Chess.com should give you a trophy for that.
It would be interesting (but hard) to create a directory for all of the content on all of the forums. Even though there is already a grouping of categories for threads, a more detailed directory would group individual posts as well as individual threads.
That's ummm "but's" job. He already claimed it! xD
I meant all of the content on the chess.com forums instead of just this thread.
Yes, that'll be a pain to do. I'm going to stick to this thread for now. :P
camberfoil wrote:
Yes.
Yes about online chess or yes that "but" gets kicked alot?
Oct 23, 2014
0
#3598
camberfoil wrote:
Yes.
Your posts are so ambiguous. Who or what are you responding to each time?! Lol!!!!
gg ...
but wrote:
awesomechess1729 wrote:
dragonair234 wrote:
awesomechess1729 wrote:
dragonair234 wrote:
but wrote:
I don't know. I don't study openings. I'm about to go make a table of contents for the 4000+posts we have on this forum. So if anyone wants to find anything, it'll be here. That's going to take a while though...
That would be intriguing. Chess.com should give you a trophy for that.
It would be interesting (but hard) to create a directory for all of the content on all of the forums. Even though there is already a grouping of categories for threads, a more detailed directory would group individual posts as well as individual threads.
That's ummm "but's" job. He already claimed it! xD
I meant all of the content on the chess.com forums instead of just this thread.
Yes, that'll be a pain to do. I'm going to stick to this thread for now. :P
And it will be confusing for non-chessers wanting to become chessers
@ Camber: You may.