idk
Someone explain this...
Sort:
Nov 27, 2023
0
#23
TigerBabyHro wrote:
how in the world does he... have... a... higher accuracy...
by the way on this game, the estimated ratings thing was just bugging out like crazy, it didn't show the game phase rating for some of the phases, and it said i was 2200 and my opponent was 1200: I made sure that it wasn't analyzing from move 1 too (cause that's what i thought at the beginning cuz one of his first moves was a blunder) but i specifically even analyzed the whole game over again and it's still broken
cuz hes just better like that blud
Some best moves are easier than others. If my opponent hangs their queen for no reason, it's a simple move and only 1 good one. If there are multiple good moves and I select the best one that's probably weighted more highly.
If one player keeps selecting to exchange pieces from a choice of good moves, that might a better 'best move'. If the opponent keeps doing the obvious thing and continuing the exchange, those 'best moves' could count for less. So the overall score for the first player is based on the best moves, whereas the overall score for the second player is based more on the average moves.
Even with a blunder in there, there are big blunders (hanging the queen) and small blunders (not taking a free pawn, in the hope of creating a fork with your next move) - I doubt the rating views them equally. Playing at a low level, I often find I blunder into winning positions, since the engine thinks I'm playing a world-class player and not someone at my low level.