sore losers

1000 rated players are dumb

The only reason I have this pic is because of the guy in it, not the facepalm.
Feel free to challenge me if you want, I don't mind it.
I also didn't talk trash, I ended the sentence 'at the level WE'RE on'.
Whatever. I'm completely aware that I'm not a good player.

I didn't say that you're not a good player. I said 1000 rated players are dumb. I noticed you're less than 1000. If Forrest Gump played chess, his rating would be higher than 1000.

So if you have slightly lower than average intelligence, your rating should be higher than 1000 with a minimal amount of work.

Good luck adding to that three digit rating.

Why, oh why, always some guy just has to kick the door and say things like that?
I seriously can't tell if you guys are troll or just plain arrogant arseholes.
How about let anyone play the way they want, the way they can, without ever insulting each other?
Jesus.
It's always this. I'm so sick of people like this.

I will play anyone of any rating, and i dont offer/accept rematches.  Its not personal, find another game, and move on.  No one here is obligated to rematch. 

haaaaaaaahahaha! You can take your lessons more easily, or you can take them the hard way. Being a jerk is worth at least 100 elo points.

ya actually 1000 players arent dumb listen to yourself on your high horse lol

you start at around 700 so to make it to 1000 is pretty damn good at the beginng 2 days im at almost 1300 or so in a little over 2 days

ya obviously i loose fair and square but the point is i put up such a fight they refuse to play again i think you missed the point and read into it trying to make your self feel better by degrading players with less skill than you i dont sit on a high horse and spew rhetoric like i said if you want to play me lets go no need to  keep going on and i we get it bow down to all might chess gods lol please really

seriously though ... an avid and experienced adult player with a 1000 rating must have an IQ of 66, which would be lower than Forrest Gump's 75.

Hilarious

I'm sure that none of these 1000 rated players are 40 years old and have been playing faithfully since they were a kid.

So don't take it personal. I my self am quite an underachiever.

My favourite is that when one thinks just because they're better at a board game, they're suddenly awarded the right to go around insulting people like a kid.
I understand that this is the internet, but does that automatically mean one must be an arrogant idiot?

Yes. Yes it does.

In 95% cases I don't accept a rematch and why should I , after all it is my right to rematch with someone or not, rematch is voluntary and not some obligation that people need to whine about it. I think it depends on invidual character, some people take a defeat on their heart and immediately want to have a rematch just for the sake of leveling the score.

... or achieving two consecutive losses.

Pulpofeira wrote:

He saw the position after 30 min playing. You can imagine what a mess it was, since he was playing Kasparov.

Okie. Was he arrested? (Kaspy)

Pulpofeira wrote:

... or achieving two consecutive losses.

Usually followed by a third, and a fourth, and so on.

When you win you and they complain you need to rub it in their face.

What is a plonker? I will gladly take this award. Put it in my trophy case. I take pride in being an asshole to weaker players; even though I'm not that strong my self.

Now that is sad...

Sometimes I do win a game: and have been asked for a rematch. However, recently I lost the next 2 games. I now feel as if I should have quit while I was ahead.

The most revealing thing about anyone's intelligence in this post is when a person uses the 5 year old's insult word that is, the word "dumb", as the best they can come up with when trying to insult.

I can certainly come up with better insults than that, dipshit. You want me to get banned?