King343 wrote:
*snip* Magnus is good, but he isn't better than the average chess player
good=having the required qualities; of a high standard
average=typical; common; ordinary
good <> average
Sorry i don't believe there is such thing as better chess players
Sort:
They are better then us, what do you think happens when you play really strong tournaments from the age of a small chilld until adult life combined with excellent coaching. You will never be as good as one of them. Maybe quit chess alltogether if this egalitarian BS you are spouting is what you believe in.
I feel like everyone has the same equal strength in a game like chess...and you win, lose and draw some
these top 10 "grandmasters" arn't really better than us
Magnus is good, but he isn't better than the average chess player