Stockfish is blind!

This forum has gotten completely out of hand and unrelated to the topic. I will say that I looked through the position and some of the lines described with SF10dev, and it appears the op is telling the truth in that the position is won for white. There are many variations in which the evaluation suddenly flips to put white at a completely winning number. In addition, the position is locked and white’s pieces have access to the king while black’s are cut off. This bears a strong resemblance to AlphaZero’s games, in which Stockfish’s pieces were cut off from the action and he was eventually locked down and crushed. Long story short, I believe him when he says the position is winning, but it seems so utterly complex, with mates in several dozen moves (holy crap!) that I am skeptical he found this in a live game with no engine assistance. 

Number 1 reason why am on this forum: To make sure people don't think there is tons of useful stuff on this forum. If there's one thing I hate, it's when people are fooled by people like you, claiming things with no proof, claiming that there is proof. Basically, a really stubborn person that will do anything to be right. No one should do such a thing except a child (and Trump, he does that half the time he talks lol) Yet you continue to do it. Why? Are you so desparate for attention as to claim what you are claiming? Well, you've got the attention. I doubt there is any other thread as active for such a long time as your thread.

Could you at least play ONE game to show us how Strong you are.

Otherwise I don't see any mate with this move after Qf6+

So could Qf6+ be wrong?

P.S. @Lyudmil_Tsvetkov I am not Japanese. I just like (not addicted) to pokemon which it originated from

Now, this is a good post and to-the-point.

Everyone who takes the effort to investigate with SF will see I am telling the truth.

Of course, I found it myself - who else, if top engines STILL don't see it?

Now, this was easy as I have played thousand similar games crushing SF.

My other book, "The Secret of Chess", has specific terms for rook on an edge(h-file) file attacking the enemy king shelter, pointed chain(the d4-e5-f6 pawns later on) as well as twice backward shelter pawn(the f7 black pawn restricted by the white e5 and g5 pawns).

Look carefully at this TOC: https://www.amazon.com/Secret-Chess-Lyudmil-Tsvetkov/dp/1522041400#reader_1522041400

Where I have taken these orginal terms from?

From the countless PRACTICAL games I have played against SF, of course!

Now, concerning the actual game: I did post links from the encounter LIVE on a forum, either here or on the Secret of Chess forum; they should be still there, just too busy now to repost.

Please, take a look.

You must understand that Lyudmil is not as good as it sounds. He refuses to play any games with anyone to avoid looking bad. Just to make an excuse for waiting, he said he was very busy and couldn't play any games. In reality, he is not nearly as "busy" as he makes it seem. He studies chess for hours, and he could easily give up some of this time to play on chess.com or a tournament, but he refuses to. He also has said that he sometimes GOOGLES HIS NAME FOR HOURS! He surely could give up enough time to at least play a tournament every once in a while, and play some Chess.com games! But no, he doesn't want to show the world how he is a liar. He tells us he is the best player in the world, gives no evidence, plays no games to prove it, and yet he somehow expects us to believe him. Don't get fooled by him. He never beat StockFish, he just made up some games to post and call it a win against StockFish. But these certainly aren't clever games. StockFish, according to Lyudmil, couldn't see an easy prevention of a mate. As if that's even possible when computers see dozens of moves ahead! IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR THE GAME LYUDMIL SHOWED US TO EVEN EXIST AS A GAME AGAINST STOCKFISH! StockFish can see dozens of moves ahead, and there is no possible way Lyudmil ALSO planned a mate dozens of moves ahead, and so it is impossible. Timed or not timed, there is no way Lyudmil could have seen a mate ahead of Stockfish. Impossible.

Agreed and well said Of course he could be playing a chess game in the time of writing a comment. If he is busy, he would have not that mu ch time to respond to comments. Therefore, Lyudmil is a bastard and a liar since he can't even play 1 itty bitty chess game and that means he is a fool. At least show us you FIDE or USCF rating. You probably don't even have one. So why have you even wrote this if you can't play 1 chess game?Just 1 chess game will fix this all, then we will be able to know who you are. Reveal  yourself. I don't see Lyudmil tsetkov in the fide or uscf. So he also says he is better than Magnus. Prove it. At least play against me or someone 1800>.  If you  google your name for hours, you can play maybe 90 bullet games in an hour 60 3 min games and maybe 10 15|10 games. At least play!

you really didn't understand what he said did you? He said that he is skeptical since AlphaZero makes more blunders than he could ever possibly make. But no, of course you avoided that part

First of all, you have proven that you have plenty of time to spare, such as the "hours of time spent Googling yourself" remark you made. Secondly, it takes less than 5 minutes for you to post a measly link, but hours for me to look through the THOUSANDS of posts to find one link you posted. And what if I accidentily glance over that post?

Agreed and well said Of course he could be playing a chess game in the time of writing a comment. If he is busy, he would have not that mu ch time to respond to comments. Therefore, Lyudmil is a bastard and a liar since he can't even play 1 itty bitty chess game and that means he is a fool. At least show us you FIDE or USCF rating. You probably don't even have one. So why have you even wrote this if you can't play 1 chess game?Just 1 chess game will fix this all, then we will be able to know who you are. Reveal  yourself. I don't see Lyudmil tsetkov in the fide or uscf. So he also says he is better than Magnus. Prove it. At least play against me or someone 1800>.  If you  google your name for hours, you can play maybe 90 bullet games in an hour 60 3 min games and maybe 10 15|10 games. At least play!

Hey if you so strong then challenge stockfish on chess.com full level

First of all, his excuses would be "no I'm playing the FULL level of SF on my PC", or "I'm too busy analyzing chess positions" and similar. Also, hem could say "I did" and then post a position which he cooked up and says, well, how come I can see [INSERT MOVE HERE] and SF cant?" and followed by a bunch of people instantly finding the correct move, some even showing screenshots of SF finding the move in UNDER 3 SECONDS. His "games" are also alleged (and based on his current lack of proof, logical) to be played with MASSIVE time handicaps and and very old/weak version of SF.