Studying openings is highly UNDERrated!

For my own curiosity...you are rated 600, but say you can beat a NM?  I can only assume the following:

1.  Another troll 

2.  Another weak player that will use an engine = cheating

3.  A very good player, posing as a weak player = cheating

While i dont expect an honest answer, i am curious.

Everyone, make sure the you quote when responding to one who will soon be banned (again), otherwise your comments will lack context after the deletions.

As a "600" player, do you stand by your claim that you can beat any NM in less than 30 moves?

Just another person that will get banned at some point.  The fun has run its course.

   For being stupid, if nothing else.

You are an exception...extraordinarily obtuse.

Hes not stupid, just unoriginal.  

@Band_sagger...

I don't understand your, ahhh, confidence.  Do you know what the ratings mean?  Let me explain.  every 400 points means by your current performance that an opponent should utterly and completely win.

so lets perform this thought experiment,

if you haven't artifically lowered you rating... I should utterly and completely win (at blitz) with you- as I am 1020.

Now. lets take someone who's at 1400.  they should be completely beat me.  but they haven't NO chance at reb; whos blitz in 1897.

Reb should then beat you, me, and a guy MUCH better than me.

-- so again, how do you figure you could beat him?? only two ways cheating with a computer engine- or for some wierd reason your actually 1900 blitz and are slummin with abolute chess beginners (by deliberately losing).

as someone else said. we're curious.

Look at the facts:

Band_Sagger's name.

Band_Sagger's play: losing most games in less than ten moves.

The nature of the losses.

There is no question that Band_Sagger is better than his or her rating indicates, and that he or she is seeking a low rating through deliberately poor play. That he or she could beat a NM is possible, but unlikely. That he or she is a banned user returning under another name is plausible.

Deliberate rating manipulation is a violation of the rules of this site and of the ethics of the sport. That Band_Sagger is doing so seems self-evident from a quick glance through his or her games.

I hate sandbaggers more than cheaters.

Sandbagging is cheating. Just a different sort.

Looks like he's gone.

Yeah but I meant the engine ones, they're considered the worst...

HA HA

I am glad you asked people to quote. I didn't even realize he was their. I just read the forum thread lol and than seems like he was banned and his comments were deleted lol.

Player J you just showed me I have a little grammar nazi in me :(

Then and than are not the same word.

I prophesy that you will go to meet him soon.

Because you know too much.

Yes. That's why your previous account(s) were banned. They are afraid of you.

   Still obtuse.

You enjoy shooting your mouth into your foot.