Studying openings is highly UNDERrated!

Sort:
Harvey_Wallbanger

Didn't care for it. Wish I could say didn't look at it.

ChessPatzer987
Sagg-Bander wrote:

I know you would love to be able to play such brilliant games too. No shame.

Brilliant? Your opponent simply blundered into a lost position. You won, but it wasn't a "brilliant" game.

Harvey_Wallbanger

   And when you have to whittle down a game by attrition, it shows inability to man-up and just go in for the kill.

ChessPatzer987
Sagg-Bander wrote:

Yes he blundered, i didnt ask him to do so. I made 0 mistakes in the game, not even an inaccuracy i believe. Considering it was a 3 min game quite impressive, no?

Yes, you did make inaccuracies.

Harvey_Wallbanger

   I'll bet you think this thread is about YOU.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QQ4kSCXf1GM

ChessPatzer987
Sagg-Bander wrote:

No Wallbanger its a sign of a good player. Say one Patzer(is your name, sry lol)

It's just a username. By the way, arrogance is never a good look.

ChessPatzer987
Sagg-Bander wrote:

You didnt say one inaccuracy. And yes sorry but on this one i am supposed to be slightly arrogant. I have an illness, you wont understand.

After 26. Qg6, Black can't prevent checkmate. Therefore, your game was far from perfect.

Diakonia
Sagg-Bander wrote:

why sir?

Now you have 2 accounts.  You did read the TOS when you signed up right?

Harvey_Wallbanger

   He plays like a girl.

X_PLAYER_J_X

Make sure you quote him when you reply because he will be banned again sooner or later and when he is all his forum comments will be deleted.

Once they are deleted if you did not quote him it will make you look like your having a conversation with yourself. Which will make it seem like you are a lil strange in the head.

ChessPatzer987
Sagg-Bander wrote:

Patzer i know, but that was too obvious and easy. You can not consider this as a mistake just because I chose the way of winning I wanted. yes Diakonia but they didnt give me another option. Because they muted Band_Sagger... For no reason.

It's an inaccuracy. I don't care if you don't want to admit it.

Diakonia
Sagg-Bander wrote:

Patzer i know, but that was too obvious and easy. You can not consider this as a mistake just because I chose the way of winning I wanted. yes Diakonia but they didnt give me another option. Because they muted Band_Sagger... For no reason.

So you do have 2 accounts, which is against the TOS, and you went from a 600 player to a 2200 player?  Youre reported, and yes i know youll be back

ChessPatzer987
Sagg-Bander wrote:

Patzer i know, but that was too obvious and easy. You can not consider this as a mistake just because I chose the way of winning I wanted. yes Diakonia but they didnt give me another option. Because they muted Band_Sagger... For no reason.

For no reason? You're funny!

ChessPatzer987
Sagg-Bander wrote:

patzer i think you know what I mean? When i dont want to go for the immediate checkmate then you cant call that a mistake whatsoever, cause i could have ended the game immediatly.

Diakonia, as i said they muted my account, so i dont see it as an account aNy l nger. This gives me the right to create another accpunt.

What? I don't get your point at all. Missing the fastest path to victory is considered an inaccuracy. There are no excuses whatsoever.

ChessPatzer987
Sagg-Bander wrote:

Yes there was no conrete reason. I didnt even get a message from the staff to warn me, i just got randomly muted.

Continue deluding yourself. You got muted because of your hypocritical comments.

ChessPatzer987
Sagg-Bander wrote:

... Dude i just didnt want to finish the game cause i saw this simplification tactic which of course also wins and in a even nicer way.

Tactic? Making your win even harder isn't considered a "tactic".

Diakonia
Sagg-Bander wrote:

patzer i think you know what I mean? When i dont want to go for the immediate checkmate then you cant call that a mistake whatsoever, cause i could have ended the game immediatly.

Diakonia, as i said they muted my account, so i dont see it as an account aNy l nger. This gives me the right to create another accpunt.

Keep opening accounts...youre like a dog chasing his tail, no matter how many times you watch it, its still funny to watch.  You will just keep getting reported, and youll keep opening accounts.  

Diakonia
Sagg-Bander wrote:

... Dude i just didnt want to finish the game cause i saw this simplification tactic which of course also wins and in a even nicer way.

missing an easier win is not a tactic, its a mistake.

ChessPatzer987
Diakonia wrote:
Sagg-Bander wrote:

... Dude i just didnt want to finish the game cause i saw this simplification tactic which of course also wins and in a even nicer way.

missing an easier win is not a tactic, its a mistake.

Exactly!

ChessPatzer987
Sagg-Bander wrote:

... You are purposely trolling me. I did not miss Qg6, its the most obvious move ever. But when i dont want to finish the game immediately then why cant i play something else which also wins and in a even more beautiful way?

It seems to me that you're the only troll here.