@orange u can complaint if u disagree. i hav no problem. but i knw my problem is i often loose concentration in live which i not in standard
TAking UR Games to the NExt LEvel
Sort:
learningthemoves wrote:
orangeishblue wrote:
A 1200 in Bullet and Blitz and 2100+ in Online not a chance.
I strongly disagree. Some players do better with the longer time controls because it allows them to concentrate on the actual game more than the ticking timer.
The reason I believe this may be the case is from personal experience.
(I won my first ten online chess games without a loss or draw and had a rating of 1709 before I began to get impatient waiting for my opponent to take 3 days to advance a pawn. That's when I started rushing moves to speed up the game and lost a couple hundred rating points in the process.)
Thanks for sharing your tips Ub_19!
I'm 1200 in blitz and hang my queen almost every game.
Scottrf wrote:
learningthemoves wrote:
orangeishblue wrote:
A 1200 in Bullet and Blitz and 2100+ in Online not a chance.
I strongly disagree. Some players do better with the longer time controls because it allows them to concentrate on the actual game more than the ticking timer.
The reason I believe this may be the case is from personal experience.
(I won my first ten online chess games without a loss or draw and had a rating of 1709 before I began to get impatient waiting for my opponent to take 3 days to advance a pawn. That's when I started rushing moves to speed up the game and lost a couple hundred rating points in the process.)
Thanks for sharing your tips Ub_19!
I'm 1200 in blitz and hang my queen almost every game.
Then you need to take your game to the next level
Nov 12, 2012
0
#25
Kingpatzer wrote:
next up, taking your grammar to the next level.
Him's gramma okay dokay wit me, hoo aboot him's grampa?
Powerlevel_9001 wrote:
I can not take the OP seriously, such variation between the capital and non-capital letters make me think illiteracy determines chess skill
Reading through his entire post would suggest that his CAPS-lock has the hickups
Nov 12, 2012
0
#28
orangeishblue wrote:
So learning: You are asking people to believe that a real good player is just struck stupid when playing blitz and bullet. I coould believe a 200 point difference but not 900 that is 4 and a half levels a difference between USCF class D and an Expert. It is easy to explain the difference the obviousness is striking.
I know it's hard to interpret 'tone' in print, so I'm hoping this comes across nice and polite-like.
I don't much care what someone else believes about my current rating, past rating, potential future rating or anyone else's. Know what I mean?
It's enough to be responsible for my own beliefs. Don't you feel the same way?
brother.we r not real good player.online chess we get enough time .thats why we win.
pata nehi is firangi ko,ek baat samajhne me itna time kyun lagta hai
tnx for sharing your thoughts and it is really helpful and i will try to implement in my games.
"Samsch wrote:
Kingpatzer wrote:
next up, taking your grammar to the next level.
He's probably new to the English Language..."
no we Indian are not new to the english language because,
Briteesh rooled avar kantry for money many ears. dhey destrayd avar kalchar. so let us destay thair language like dis
sara_manju wrote:
"Samsch wrote:
Kingpatzer wrote:
next up, taking your grammar to the next level.
He's probably new to the English Language..."
no we Indian are not new to the english language because,
Briteesh rooled avar kantry for money many ears. dhey destrayd avar kalchar. so let us destay thair language like dis
What a beautiful and well thought out response to the grammatical pedantry we so often see on these forums, which is tantamount to bullying.
Internet forums should promote an atitude of encouraging everyone to post, rather than attempting to enforce grammatical perfection on every member. Why should anyone have to study the English language for years just to post on a chess forum?
And if you are going to attack someone else's grammar, please get it right in your own post!
"next up, taking your grammar to the next level" , should be;
Next up; Taking your grammar to the next level.
Did everyone understand the original post?
If so, I really don't see any need for improvement of the OP's grasp of the English language.
If you didn't understand part of it, then asking for clarification from the OP would be the sensible way forward. That is, if you were ever interested in what he has to say, and not just bullying.
Next up; Taking your manners to the next level.
"nxrosco wrote:
sara_manju wrote:
"Samsch wrote:
Kingpatzer wrote:
next up, taking your grammar to the next level.
He's probably new to the English Language..."
no we Indian are not new to the english language because,
Briteesh rooled avar kantry for money many ears. dhey destrayd avar kalchar. so let us destay thair language like dis
What a beautiful and well thought out response to the grammatical pedantry we so often see on these forums, which is tantamount to bullying.
Internet forums should promote an atitude of encouraging everyone to post, rather than attempting to enforce grammatical perfection on every member. Why should anyone have to study the English language for years just to post on a chess forum?
And if you are going to attack someone else's grammar, please get it right in your own post!
"next up, taking your grammar to the next level" , should be;
Next up; Taking your grammar to the next level.
Did everyone understand the original post?
If so, I really don't see any need for improvement of the OP's grasp of the English language.
If you didn't understand part of it, then asking for clarification from the OP would be the sensible way forward. That is, if you were ever interested in what he has to say, and not just bullying.
Next up; Taking your manners to the next level."
well said, i have seen even british people making many mistakes in english language being their national language. so wat if we commit? our aim is to convey the message and not taking english to next level. so i wanted to respond sharply .u being british praising what i said. great! thanx
nxrosco wrote:
And if you are going to attack someone else's grammar, please get it right in your own post!
Next up; Taking your manners to the next level.
Incorrect use of a semicolon and incorrect capitalisation of the T in "Taking"...
nxrosco wrote:
And if you are going to attack someone else's grammar, please get it right in your own post!
Next up; Taking your manners to the next level.
Incorrect use of a semicolon and incorrect capitalisation of the T in "Taking"...
nann of ur igilishu is corret. cee only i know gud englishu bcose i am INDIAN and we r rolled and tot inglishu by original britishers. so if u want to learn from me contact me
OldHastonian wrote:
nxrosco wrote:
And if you are going to attack someone else's grammar, please get it right in your own post!
Next up; Taking your manners to the next level.
Incorrect use of a semicolon and incorrect capitalisation of the T in "Taking"...
The 'T' should be capitalised, as it is the start of an imaginary thread title. The semicolon, on the other hand, should be a colon, so you were half right. I apologise for my typographical faux pas, but is that really all you took from my post?
Scottrf wrote:
learningthemoves wrote:
orangeishblue wrote:
A 1200 in Bullet and Blitz and 2100+ in Online not a chance.
I strongly disagree. Some players do better with the longer time controls because it allows them to concentrate on the actual game more than the ticking timer.
The reason I believe this may be the case is from personal experience.
(I won my first ten online chess games without a loss or draw and had a rating of 1709 before I began to get impatient waiting for my opponent to take 3 days to advance a pawn. That's when I started rushing moves to speed up the game and lost a couple hundred rating points in the process.)
Thanks for sharing your tips Ub_19!
I'm 1200 in blitz and hang my queen almost every game.
First comment on chess.com that made me laugh out loud, not laughing out of spite. Just that I find myself regularly doing it as well.
Concentration is hard under time pressure, and if you have slower internet you sometimes have to resort to pre-moves. Alot of the times I see a move which I think is best for the opponent, and instead he blunders a piece. But because of my pre-move against his best option, I lose my lady :(
we need to underatand at last we just need to share thoughts so use any way to communicate, not matter gramatical correct or not, ultimate aim achieves if other people got our msg.....
importance of basic-
take your basics and common sense to next level...
in khdus firangiyo ko thodasi akal dede bhagvan...
but som peepul want to sho up their english here. i think they don't know anything else except english. they must know we indians know many languages along with english. howcome they r not feeling ashamed to do like that? but the one who goes correct someones english at least should know proper english. that is also not there. just no manners only
A 1200 in Bullet and Blitz and 2100+ in Online not a chance.
I strongly disagree. Some players do better with the longer time controls because it allows them to concentrate on the actual game more than the ticking timer.
The reason I believe this may be the case is from personal experience.
(I won my first ten online chess games without a loss or draw and had a rating of 1709 before I began to get impatient waiting for my opponent to take 3 days to advance a pawn. That's when I started rushing moves to speed up the game and lost a couple hundred rating points in the process.)
Thanks for sharing your tips Ub_19!