We have all realized there are bugs and glitches on the site, and that we have to be patient. There is no hurry in fixing this problem, it's just a proposition.
What I would like, is for staff to acknowledge this demand, and tell us whether it is something we can hope for.
I'm really having a hard time with what you say. You call it a proposition in one sentence and a demand in the next. To me it's just a request to change the archive which already exists in vote chess to a continuous page. It's a pain to a few people like it is. Has anyone asked why it's set up that way and why everything is archived the way it's done now? Might help for understanding why the system the way it is.
There is no problem that I see. Just an easier way to view notes without it being archived every move.
Does the staff know that this forum is here to be able to come in and read it? This isn't one of the forums they would monitor being that it's on you're homepage.
I can tell you that we can all hope for it. Getting it is another issue altogether. It would help to have it this way. The only question is when it might be considered as something they may want to change in the future. For now, I don't think they can give a timeline on this until they get a lot of these bugs fixed. They can't give a time line on that either.
I do agree, patience is needed, even for an acknowledgement from staff as their attention is on fixing the already many bugs out there.
"Proposition" or "demand" ? "Proposition" was used as opposed to "problem". I don't think I could be as impolite as to make a "demand" in the disagreable sense here, it's just something vc players would really like, fine for "Request", english is not my mother tongue.
I have published this link several times on threads where vc is discussed. There has been a lot of discussion recently on chess.com feedback and other staff.com threads about vc tied votes and other vc realted subjects.
So, yes, it has come to their attention, I made sure of that.
true..., but as we would load single pages only, they would not be heavier than others...?
In forums you click on the closest Next page, but in vc you have to go back to the list of moves an click on it. It is very clumsy, and discourageing.
"Proposition" or "demand" ? "Proposition" was used as opposed to "problem". I don't think I could be as impolite as to make a "demand" in the disagreable sense here, it's just something vc players would really like, fine for "Request", english is not my mother tongue.
I have published this link several times on threads where vc is discussed. There has been a lot of discussion recently on chess.com feedback and other staff.com threads about vc tied votes and other vc realted subjects.
So, yes, it has come to their attention, I made sure of that.
If it has come to their attention as you say, then they know about it. Why do you need further acknowledgement for it? It appears to me like it now just a waiting time to see if it will ever be addd to the site. Until then, I dont think they will add anything until they get all these bugs fixed.
Because they have never answered, in any of the threads.
Okay, so your not sure it got their attention and want verification that they did see it. Now I understand.....
Having both might be difficult to implement. Personally I prefer having all comments on one continuous (or several) pages.
OP ?