Yes, i think so. I dont like chess played in under 5 minutes. But i dont have an hour each side either. So i generally play 10 minutes a side. Then the longest a game can take is 20 minutes. Its long enough that 4 or 5 times a game, when there are some really important moves, you can spend a minute or 2 thinking about that move. I think this time limit is a good compromise.
I had a winnable game the other day but lost on time. So i actually play 8/3 (8 minutes per side, with a +3 second increment so in the end game i get 3 seconds to make moves (at worst).
Hello all. The forums are littered with various discussions of the merits of Blitz and Bullet chess. I'm more interested in learning about games with a time control of ten minutes, no increment (10/0). Although such is categorized as blitz chess here, do you think that chess played with 10/0 time controls is long enough to have a decent game?