If one may judge a player's strength by comparing him with his contemporaries, it seems to me that Fischer's achievement is unsurpassed - the gap between him and his closest rivals was the widest there ever was between a World Champion and the other top-ranking players of his time. He was some 10-15 years ahead of his time in his preparation and understanding. This could be attributed in part to his dedication to the game, which was unequalled by any other player before or since.
that is a quote by Kasparov, if he was 15 years ahead of his time in understanding, he definetly was ahead of Karpov.
Kasparov himself is of the opinion that Karpov would have won the match. It is very difficult to call, but for sure it was a new challenge, the like of which Fischer had not faced previously.
well than obviously either Kasparov but me shizophrene or you are not telling the truth. because Kasparov said fischer was 15 years ahead of time, if he met Karpov and was ahead of him, how could he think he would lose??
It is all chronicled in his volumes of My Great Predecessors.